The collusion hoax counter-investigation thread

It’s time. Let’s start with:

A guide to the players:

The art of the no deal.

1 Like

In related news, the Senate voted to prohibit anybody who improperly interfered (as opposed to, I suppose, proper interference) in a US election from obtaining a visa.

They’ll just have to cross over from Mexico then.

1 Like

Broad in scope. Sounds familiar.

The move is being seen as the Conte government’s response to the previous government’s coordinated surveillance activity with U.S. intelligence officials during the 2016 U.S. election.

The shake-up comes as “SpyGate” (known in Italy as “ItalyGate”) heats up with new developments breaking almost every day.

:point_up_2: and this from Italy.
Oh the fires are burning closer

1 Like

Due process!

1 Like

Grand jury, you say?

Yeah, moving like a snail in church. Everyone suspected Mifsud was put up to it by western intelligence.

Working theory, Brennan (CIA) gets MI6 (either current or retired) to get London Centre of International Law Practice (LCILP) to set up some meeting with Papadopoulos and Mifsud. MI6 then monitor and feed back the information to the CIA and Brennan then passes it to Comey. Investigate!

3 years after the fact they get Mifsud on the record and probably the London Centre of International Law Practice (LCILP) connection. Don’t hold your breath there will be a speedy link to who told them.

Certainly off to a very delayed start. But it’s political on both sides, so perhaps they needed the deck cleared by the Mueller meltdown before the optics would be right.

The back channel could be more than MI6 to Brennan, it could be Clinton involvement or Fusion GPS.

But these are obvious questions that should have been asked 3 years ago, am I impressed Mifsud is now on record saying something? Not really, it just is another wild goose chase which leads to nowhere.

I will be pleasantly surprised if I am proven wrong.