I think the ball is on the theory debunkers side of the net.
are you saying that americans are a grumpy old fellow, standing in the porch of their wood houses, chewing something (put your favorite here) and holding a loaded shotgun?
thewebfairy.com/killtown/911smokingguns.html
If you believe the official story of 9/11, please attempt to refute even 10% of the information in this link. All the info is even from YOUR trusted mainstream sources.
thewebfairy.com/killtown/911smokingguns.html
If you believe the official story of 9/11, please attempt to refute even 10% of the information in this link. All the info is even from YOUR trusted mainstream sources.
[quote=âSpecialEdâ]http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/911smokingguns.html
If you believe the official story of 9/11, please attempt to refute even 10% of the information in this link. All the info is even from YOUR trusted mainstream sources.[/quote]
How IS David Icke these days?
[quote]
The W.T.C. Disaster
This attack on the American people in my opinion is not from Bin Laden (this doesnât mean he isnât guilty of participating in this disaster or of other attacks around the globe.) but from our own Government against its citizens by the occult leaders in various positions to facilitate the New World Order of the Anti-Christ. [/quote]
True to form I see. :bravo:
Donât really understand your post JD. Iâm guessing that the guy who made that very interesting htmlâŚis David IckleâŚand that he isnât a very trustworthy source?
Well, almost every genius who has non-mainstream ideas is considered a quackâŚuntil they are proven right. And just because some of his other ideas seem laughable doesnât mean that those links are any less true.
The above poster asked if you could refute 10% or more of the statements found through his linkâŚlooks to me like you canâtâŚso youâre just going to mock instead.
HAHAHA, this is my favorite part of that link:
YeahâŚthey had nothing to gain by 9/11 
.
[quote=âMordethâ]Donât really understand your post JD. Iâm guessing that the guy who made that very interesting htmlâŚis David IckleâŚand that he isnât a very trustworthy source?
Well, almost every genius who has non-mainstream ideas is considered a quackâŚuntil they are proven right. And just because some of his other ideas seem laughable doesnât mean that those links are any less true.
The above poster asked if you could refute 10% or more of the statements found through his linkâŚlooks to me like you canâtâŚso youâre just going to mock instead.[/quote]
Do a little research before you state the obvious next time. If you like the idea of reptile people masquerading as humans, mostly republicans and conservatives abroad, taking over and enslaving the world for their ET masters to be thoughtprovoking, fine by me. 
Try following his numerological examination of 911 and not getting a headache or laughing.
But please, by all means, check him out.
davidicke.com/content/category/4/13/26/
And while youâre at it, google david Icke, and read how the former soccer player had a nervous breakdown, claimed to be Jesus Christ, and is now a âsuccessfulâ author of books for the paranoid and downright wackjobs.
Mordeth, David Icke is universally known as a âquack.â He assertied that Hussein was dead, about 10 years ago. (Saddam, not Nassar) He is as they say in Latin, a fruitus loopus. He makes Uri Gellar look like a bloke Iâd buy a car from! The TEKWAR is a more likely scenario than Icke saying something sensible.
Fine heâs a quack. But in that one specific htmlâŚif all his quotes are correctâŚand the links work. AND you canât refute any of itâŚthen itâs still valid. Regardless of who wrote it. If the craziest man in the world writes that the ocean contains waterâŚare you going to argue it because heâs crazy?
ok sorry i just have one more post to end my little rant. then iâm done.
Iâve said every time, believe what you will. BUT⌠do that AFTER considering ALL the information presented to you, even a âconspiracy theoryâ. I know for some, it is really such a jarring thought to consider that their Government is not acting in the peopleâs best interests, and the population is being lied to about nearly everything.
But, if one really claims to WANT the truth, they will seek out as much information as they can find to gain the widest perspective on an issue. Is one truly being openminded when they simply claim the mainstream news sources as 100% fact and any other report or story that doesnât support the mainstream news claim is a loony conspiracy theory?
I read The Star and watch the mainsteam news daily, but I also, like ZILLIONS of other people these days, consider another side to the story. (over 50% of people in NY believe the Government had foreknowledge of 9/11, and as someone mentioned 85% on a CNN poll of all places)
There is no point in throwin sticks and stones in a forum like this. If you people are teachers, you should be about the positive growth of the human species by teaching them kids how to think freely and critically about the world around them. At least, that is the kind of teacher I would want my kids to have, it may not be universal.
Propaganda and fear has been used to control populations from the beginning. Why are people so quick to believe that NOW it is any different? Now, the methods are just far more advanced. There IS something terribly wrong with the planet you live on. Everyone can agree on that I hope. THROUGHOUT HISTORY the State has decieved their public. This is nothing new. I find it hard to fathom sometimes why people donât WANT to know more about the âother side of the storyâ from that which their Governments are telling them. Have they done THAT good a job conditioning the masses to âStand on Guard for Theeâ and take an order to execute a woman and her children on the streets of Iraq. This DOES happen, whether they report it on CBC or not is irrelevant. And in fact, they DO, but itâs quickly brushed aside in favour of something like âpotential TERRORIST accused of BEHEADING THE PRIME MINISTER sources sayâ.
If anyone wants to see some info that they may not have been aware is out there, feel free to ask here or PM. I donât bicker like this in âreal lifeâ so Iâm not going to do it here. In either form itâs not a positive way to build.
Peace.
Fine heâs a quack. But in that one specific htmlâŚif all his quotes are correctâŚand the links work. AND you canât refute any of itâŚthen itâs still valid. Regardless of who wrote it. If the craziest man in the world writes that the ocean contains waterâŚare you going to argue it because heâs crazy?[/quote]
Those are REALLY big ifs. Many of those things listed are disputed, some just wrong, and some misrepresented by Dr Wacko.
When a guy says âThe government did itâŚâ and âThe government is a secret organization of reptile people that go back for eonsâŚâ uhm, yes, I am going to argue it. His facts are backed up primarily using numerology and âdevil hornâ hand signs.
Surfers Rule Dude!
by the wayâŚsome call it the âShakaâ signâŚ
I believe that the bush junta could finaly release footage of âthe planeâ hitting the Pentagon before the elections. Those are the rumours.
It doesnât put into question the criminals behind the whole plan. And Iâm not talking about some kidney failing bandit in a cave with a laptop (was it AOL who provided wi-fi in Afghanistan?) Nor am I talking about the muppet Bush who couldnât organise a piss up in a brewery.
Ted âChappaquiddick Diving Schoolâ Kennedy teaches the Macarena on wednesday afternoons at the Arlington Holiday Inn rec center.
Okay. I AM a we-never-went-to-the-moon nut, but my ex husband just posted this doozie. I canât believe we were ever married 
4 Likes
That is a doozie.
Of course, Hawking did say that Earth would turn into a Venus under Trumpâs environmental policies, or words to that effect.
As for the moon⌠it is kind of interesting that no oneâs been back there in almost 50 years.
What? Is the moon some sort of space version of a red-headed stepchild for Musk and others? It doesnât even get the respect of being a rest stop for galactic travel.
1 Like
I totally donât believe that narrorative!
pure hollywood
Yes, years ago I read a website that delved into that trip in very very very exquisite details.
The same site also went into a very detailed analysis of Laurel Canyon residents in the 1960s/70s.
Oh lawd. Heâs found his birds. I hope they are all yanking his chain.