The narratives about Trump thread (Part 1)

Let her stand there with a rifil nine barrels pointing at her when the guns are trained on her face.
Nine to one fair fight!

Trump is losing the election big time. That’s why his methaphore turned out to be nine to one.
What a sour loser.

Yes and nowhere does Trump mention a firing squad. You are not so obtuse as to claim he mentioned that are you?

Sure according yo what you wrote before Trump is losing by 30 points.

What he was describing resembles a firing squad. But what’s the difference in Trump world. Harris would be done by now if she said anything like that one.

So you finally agree! :blush:

Where did I write I agree. All I wrote is YOU made such a claim. Not I.

I’m willing to wager you 100K Euro Harris does not win by 30 points. Put your money where your mouth is.

You said sure!

Yes I did. But you fail to understand the word sure can have multiple meanings, and can sometimes mean the opposite of what you might expect:

Did I fail to understand it! Guess what no I did not fail to understand what you actually wanted to say.

You are the one misinterpretating statements made by certain people politicians and reinterpretate them to your liking.

I only gave your guys some of your own medicine and how tiring it can be replying to these BS arguments.

I did? Show me where Trump said a firing squad should take out Liz Cheney? Do quote it.

So you’re trolling us?

You quote me where I said Trump said firing squad!

My god you are full of if.

You said it— not Trump.

As I said:

CNN contributor takes back Cheney ‘firing squad’ quip: ‘I was wrong’

“Trump was making – albeit in his customary fashion – a different argument about Cheney’s alleged foreign policy views and the use of force,” Goldberg stated. “I let my disgust at Trump’s comments get the better of me as this was the first time I’d heard them.”

Ah, the liberal talking head version of “Sowwwwy!”

CNN contributor takes back Cheney ‘firing squad’ quip: ‘I was wrong’

“I regret the initial comment because it was inaccurate and contributed to the kind of overheated environment Trump thrives on,” he continued.

“President Trump is 100% correct that warmongers like Liz Cheney are very quick to start wars and send other Americans to fight them, rather than go into combat themselves. This is the continuation of the latest fake media outrage days before the election in a blatant attempt to interfere on behalf of Kamala Harris,” said Karoline Leavitt, Trump campaign national press secretary.

OK

“Let’s put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her, OK. Let’s see how she feels about it, you know, when the guns are trained on her face,” Trump said. “You know, they’re all war hawks when they’re sitting in Washington in a nice building saying, ‘oh, gee, we’ll, let’s send — let’s send 10,000 troops right into the mouth of the enemy.’”

He was just talking about a war zone scenario where she would be outnumbered to show that she likes to send soldiers to war without knowing what that is like for the soldiers. I don’t mind him criticizing her for being hawkish, but l doubt he would act much differently than the Cheney’s would another 911 happen under his watch or Iran attacked US bases. Glad that he has firsthand war zone experience himself. Makes him more qualified to make the right decisions.

Damned for who he is and who is not then?

I seem to recall him letting the military guys in the field make the calls. He’s sign off on them — but he gave them great flexibility to call their own plays.

I could be wrong— but I don’t think I am.

He’s made big threats to North Korea and others when he was president. Let’s see what he will do if those threats are not taken seriously the next time, if he makes it to the WH again, god forbid.

What makes you think the world also wants to upset the world order?

Let’s get some things straight here. We all know which party the Cheney’s belong to.

Who is sending thousands of soldiers into a meat assault everyday?
Right now, there is Putin doing this 600 000 so far and counting.
Who cut/delayed amunition support to Ukraine?
How many Ukrainian soldiers faced those Russians being outnumbers without the ability to shoot back and ultimately lost their lives.
How much did this encurage Russia to keep moving on with their evil plan?

We all know who did not want to help Ukraine and encurages Russia to do what ever he wants with countries who are in NATO.

Good luck with Trump. I hope that if he wins I am all wrong, but very afraid that I am not. My wife likes to call me black bird mouth.

On a sidenote

I’m open for bets that if Trump wins, the war in Ukraine will be over within 6 months. Putin will get Crimea and Donbas, assurances Ukraine will not join Nato or the EU. And Ukraine will get… to be a Russian vassal state