The Psychology of Bush Hatred

drsanity.blogspot.com/2004/11/ps … atred.html

Some of his political stuff I don’t agree with, because I just don’t want to believe that Bush was anything else than the antichrist, but maybe I have a touch of this too. Hell, we all do. It’s a scary world. This article is very good read and too long to post in its entirety, but I’m posting some excerpts because I see a lot of people I know in this. Especially my delusional 9-11 conspiracy nut friend, and another friend who is so obsessed with Bush he still wants to watch Bush speeches and talk about them like he gets a high from it.

We all know people like this. Let’s discuss them.

[quote]Take, for example, France. In that country, the citizens as well as their leaders welcomed Yasser Arafat as some sort of folk hero; and even go to the ends of the earth to protect him after death. They also welcomed Robert Mugabe the Zimbabwe dictator, responsible for untold deaths. Yet they have made it clear that President Bush is not welcome in their country, burned him in effigy and insisted he stand trial for “war crimes”.

Take Canada. LGF links to an article detailing how the enlightened “Peace Activists” of Canada, cannot rule out violent acts when Bush visits their country in the next week. And these are just a few countries that pretend to be “friends” of the U.S. [/quote]

[quote]What makes Bush Hatred completely insane however, is the almost delusional degree of unremitting belief in Bush’s evil; while simultaneously believing that the TRUE representatives of evil in the world are somehow good and decent human beings with the world’s intersts at heart.

This psychological defense mechanism is referred to as “displacement”. One way you can usually tell that an individual is using displacement is that the emotion being displaced (e.g., anger) is all out of proportion to the reality of the situation. The purpose of displacement is to avoid having to cope with the actual reality. Instead, by using displacement, an individual is able to still experience his or her anger, but it is directed at a less threatening target than the real cause. In this way, the individual does not have to be responsible for the consequences of his/her anger and feels more safe. How else to explain the remarkable and sometimes lunatic appeasement of Islamofascists by so many governments and around the world? (e.g. here)

A very good example of displacement that comes to mind is the plot of an old movie called “The Seven Percent Solution”,which is about Sherlock Holmes’ intense obsession with Moriarity. In Holmes’ mind (distorted somewhat by the use of cocaine) Moriarity is the master criminal who must be stopped at all costs. He is evil incarnate, and the source of all the diabolical events of the world (sound familiar?).

Not until the end of the movie, under hypnosis by Sigmund Freud, do we discover that in truth, Mr. Moriarity was Sherlock’s hopelessly mundane math teacher, who happened to be having an affair with Holmes’ mother and escaped when Holmes’ father murdered her (with the young Sherlock looking on). This event in his youth apparently traumatized Holmes to such an extent, he was eventually driven to using drugs to eradicate it from his memory. And pursuing the mythical genius of crime–instead of holding his father or his mother to account.

I submit to you that this is exactly the same process going on now in the minds of many of the Bush Haters. They want desperately to forget that there is a tidal wave of terror reverberating around the world and to pretend that everything is America and Bush’s fault. So what do they do? They lionize terrorists like Arafat. They explain away the horror and brutality of Zarqawi and his followers. They support Palestinian suicide bombings and vote for resolutions agains Israel. They believe that Osama is a reasonable person, but that Bush is not. They threaten violence toward Bush and hold demonstrations; and implement Sharia Law in their country without a qualm. Hundreds of their fellow countrymen are murdered by terrorists, but they demand that their troops be pulled out of Iraq (thinking that if they hadn’t cooperated with the evil BushHitler, their countrymen would have been spared).
[/quote]

Read the whole article at the link, it’s worth it. While it’s obvious that this guy’s politcal bias is to the right, he hit the nail on the head. This describes so many people I know. Let’s talk about it and become less insane.

It’s not hard to believe that someone could hate a man who needlessly killed tens of thousands of people. Silly liberals.

Who? Clinton?

Idi Amin?

Didn’t George Bush blow up the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, then blame it on Islamic terrorists?

Uh, I’m sorry SS, but I’m pretty sure it wer thuh Jewzzz

Isn’t every president vilified and ‘hated’ by a portion of the US and the World?

Funny that such a thread should appear during an era of Obama Derangement Sydrome…

Soon the Bush admin will be just another page in the history books of the United States of Amnesia.

But not in Texas.

He killed thousands? How on Earth did he find the time?
Would it have been alright if he had killed them needfully?

pffft…read the original…

[quote]Bush Derangement Syndrome
by Charles Krauthammer
excerpt…
Bush Derangement Syndrome: the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency – nay – the very existence of George W. Bush.[/quote]

and there is even a Cheney variation…

[quote]Bush Derangement Syndrome, Cheney Variant
By Charles Krauthammer
excerpt…
And as a former chief resident of the psychiatric consultation service of the Massachusetts General Hospital – my house staff was called in to diagnose and treat medical in-patients (many of them post-op, many with cardiac disease) who had developed psychiatric symptoms – I know something about organically caused dementias. And I know pseudoscientific rubbish when I see it.

If there’s a diagnosis to be made here, it is this: yet another case of the one other syndrome I have been credited with identifying, a condition that addles the brain of otherwise normal journalists and can strike without warning – Bush Derangement Syndrome, Cheney Variant. [/quote]

note the pop-up puppets who magically inject their bumper-sticker talking points…the derangement still exists…

Oversaw the launch of a completely needless war that has killed hundreds of thousands and the worst financial crisis in decades. It really beggars the question, just how bad would a Republican president have to be before his cheerleaders on the Flob admitted it?

That’s the derangement syndrome right there.

HG

He killed thousands? How on Earth did he find the time?
Would it have been alright if he had killed them needfully?[/quote]
According to The Lancet (October 1, 2006), the unnecessary war Bush lied us into caused an estimated 654,9651 deaths.

The difference between Bush-haters and Obama-haters is that Bush-haters hated Bush because of what he actually did (torture, spying, war), whereas Obama-haters hate Obama because of what they erroneously think he is (a Muslim, a socialist, a native-born Kenyan).

I didn’t vote for Bush, and I think he made a number of poor decisions that have had severe consequences. I don’t think he was intelligent or politically skilled enough to be a good chief executive. I was happy when his second term was up. However, I don’t think he was or is evil. In fact, I think he is a pretty decent guy. There are some qualities about him that I greatly respect. I particularly respect his refusal to speak critically of the new administration in public and private, his steadfast loyalty to people who he perceives (perhaps not always correctly) as deserving of it, and his clean lifestyle. I would break bread with George W. Bush if the situation were to ever arise.

I can’t say the same of Dick Cheney. I wouldn’t say he is evil, but I certainly wouldn’t call him a decent man.

Bush was openly anti-intellectual - not as in “I dislike the university establishment in the US and their left-leaning beliefs” anti-intellectual, but an “I dont apologize or admit when i’m obviously wrong, I dont need to read the newspapers and thats ok, i dont care what the scientists say there is no global warming and stem cell research is bad, and drilling holes here there everywhere is just fine” anti-intellectual.

Anti-intellectualism at that level, and definitely intentional anti-intellectualism, is evil.

Also evil is dragging the US into war based on lies: repeated, known lies and deceptions. All those straw men the rest of you are throwing up - the French, the Canadians, etc - they’ve got tons of issues and no one’s saying they’re all great, but we (the US in general) elected (ha!) Bush, and he is evil. So he’s not Idi Amin evil, just because he isn’t a brutal dictator doesn’t make him not evil, and more importantly, an evil elected by us.

[edit] and krauthammer’s a twat (that’s the intellectual, scientific term for a fuckwad)

[quote=“TwoTongues”]Anti-intellectualism at that level, and definitely intentional anti-intellectualism, is evil.
[/quote]
Huh? Stupid? Yes. Evil? I think you are making a bit of a stretch.

When you knowingly rail against logic, reason, science, etc - not a rational critique, but foolishness and party line mumbo jumbo - and the effect is possibly harmful to the planet, to the country, to society, whatever has a reasonable potential to harm us, etc - that’s evil, dude. It’s not that he doesn’t know, it’s that he knows and still acts the fool, to the detriment of us. Evil.

If he wasn’t educated on the issue(s) and acted that way, he’d be ignorant or stupid, and ignorance is a different gray area of potential evil I guess (still no excuse in a president).

I hate Bush. And his dad. And Obama. And that fucking Clinton fellah. They’re goddamn YANKS! FFS! What’s NOT to hate?

I hate shaved. I prefer bush.