Two good articles, by the same author:
Rudy looks good and Hillary will fizzalry; Obama’s got cash; Edwards and McCain are longshots, for a reason; Mitt ain’t quite the shit but has a lead in Florida, and Gore might could be drafted in.
Rudy Giuliani is the neoconservative rather than the conservative candidate for president. If he becomes the presidential nominee it will signal that the transformation of the Republican Party into the Neoconservative Party is complete.
Damn spook, did you even read the article?
[quote]
McCain now trails Rudy Giuliani in all polls of Republican voters, and the gap has been widening. Arguably if the Republicans nominate Giuliani, a candidate who has a record of being pro-choice, friendly to gays, supported handgun control, has been thrice married, and hails from New York, it would be a bigger deal than the nation electing a woman or an African American president. But don’t expect to read that story in the mainstream media[/quote]
And apparently that is why the left doesn’t bother themselves with it.
If Rudy was a Democrat, the Left would be stapling wings to his back and a halo to his forehead.
I thought spook was allowed to use the term ‘neoconservative / neocon’ only once a day?
added:
Anyway…IMO, its way too early to get worked up about any of this. Wait until July or August of 2008 to start wadding the panties.
Damn spook, did you even read the article?
[quote]
McCain now trails Rudy Giuliani in all polls of Republican voters, and the gap has been widening. Arguably if the Republicans nominate Giuliani, a candidate who has a record of being pro-choice, friendly to gays, supported handgun control, has been thrice married, and hails from New York, it would be a bigger deal than the nation electing a woman or an African American president. But don’t expect to read that story in the mainstream media[/quote]
And apparently that is why the left doesn’t bother themselves with it.
If Rudy was a Democrat, the Left would be stapling wings to his back and a halo to his forehead.[/quote]
Yes. The “bigger deal” the article refers to is the transformation of the Republican Party into something fundamentally different from its historic character.
[quote=“TainanCowboy”]I thought spook was allowed to use the term ‘neoconservative / neocon’ only once a day?
added:
Anyway…IMO, its way too early to get worked up about any of this. Wait until July or August of 2008 to start wadding the panties.[/quote]
Sorry about lifting your rock up. Sunlight is good for you.
spook -
Go with the God of your choice and sin, or whatever activity most closely approximates what might be viewed as most resembling what may be termed a ‘sin’ in your personal social/moral/cultural activity evaluation, no more.
Sunshine on the belly is gooooood!
The times they are a changin’.
JD, are back on the JD?
US Precedential Erections?