I don’t think you have thought this through very well, works well when you get to decide which behavior is deemed deplorable and don’t mind biased coverage in the news to buffer your outrage and you get to decide what people are not outraged by.
I doubt you would agree with Saudi Arabia’s interpretation of what behavior is deplorable nor would you find acceptable their treatment of people transgressing behavior they deem unacceptable to them.
How about the right took utter offence to open boarders policy and claimed that was what the Democrats wanted and were pushing. Out of 18,000 murders in the US last year, 22% were committed (apparently) by illegal immigrants, how about if the right found that figure so obscene and lack of actions by the Democrats so immoral they decided to encourage confrontations everywhere they saw a Democrat.
Then poured fuel on the flames by saying Democrats want illegal immigrant votes, they protect illegal immigrants with sanctuary city laws. They don’t care about Americns, they are evil, they need to be shouted down in their homes, kicked out of restaurants, confronted in the supermarket.
Would you find that a welcome development, that Republicans decide what behavior justifies treating Democrats in the manner they see fit. I doubt it very much.
Better to live by equal rights for all and I might not agree with what you say but will defend your right to say it.