Because it doesnāt make any sense. American people kiss without even thinking about it much. No oneās going to think āgee maybe this guy is going to be culturally opposed to kissingā. Half of everyone in NY is from somewhere else practically. What were they supposed to query him first. Anyway, itās NY where people donāt get bent out of shape about a simple kiss, not wherever.
No, of course they werenāt supposed to query him first. Iām on their side, but I can appreciate that others might be on his side as being the first offendee. Which, technically, he was.
If the womenās story is to be believed, I disagree. If he canāt handle people having a quick peck, gay or no, heās in the wrong place or the wrong kind of job at least.
EDIT: Iām not being a dick, by the way, I do agree. He should not be there if he canāt be tolerant. Or, they will have to learn to tolerate his beliefs.
Looking at the video, it doesnāt seem so clear cut. The driver says āI said the first time donāt do it,ā implying that he asked them to stop and they didnāt. They may have even rubbed it in his face to make a point. They seem pretty confrontational in the video. If āno kissingā is the Uber policy and he asked them to stop, he would seem to be within his rights to end the ride if they didnāt comply.
Iād say the āno kissingā policy should take part of the blame. As long as nobodyās getting bodily fluids on the back seat, what business is it of Uber what the passengers are doing back there?
Trouble is, Uber is the only thing worth suing - and itās covered its ass with a no kissing policy. I suppose the tippers of the velvet could try claiming that āno kissingā is an infringement of their rights? Nothing to be gained in suing the driver - heās got nothing.
True, but Iād still say if they were not making out in the back of his taxi, heās asking for a confrontation by making any kind of a deal it of it. Good point about the Uber rules, I bet theyāll clarify them. If the guy put too much faith in the rules, heās got a complaint against Uber I guess
I think the TLC and Uber should have at least expressed some sympathy for the driverās culture, even if they chose not to come on his side. This sort of one-sided thing is what the recent Supreme Court ruling on the Colorado baker decried.
Furthermore, they shot the hot lesbian couple all smiley, really not depicting people who were discriminated against.
Yeah. Iām certainly not in favor of Islamic mores being imposed on American behavior, but if the driver is being punished for enforcing Uberās policies, thatās not fair either.
Great. Now try telling Uber to follow your rulesā¦
(Btw I should clarify what I wrote earlier: Iām not taking a position on whether or not PDAās ā of whatever sexual orientation ā should be allowed. Iām just against this notion that itās proper for Uber to be a de facto taxi company but smugly claim āceci nāest pas un taxiā every time a dispute arises, as discussed in āUber? Should Taiwan allow Uber to operate?ā)