5 posts were merged into an existing topic: From politics
No one asked me if I think all laws are inherently morally right or wrong. The answer is I donât think all laws are inherently right or inherently wrong. Slavery, for example, is morally wrong. Nations, on the other hand, have the moral right to decide who gets to immigrate to them.
Quote modified from âblack manâ to âimmigrantâ, as itâs the same trick, duping the same mouth-breathing demographic, but in the 21st century. 
You guys prove my point so well. Itâs despicable how you make this your main issue as the country and itâs image worldwide is getting ripped apart and sold to the highest bidder by this insanely corrupt administration.
What, you donât think itâs true? Would you say the education is worse?
I can understand how they are having difficulty processing this concept.
Omg, that was the question I put to another guy and you quoted it and started asking other questions instead of answering the question you quotedâŚ
Doesnât immigration law apply based on legal status and not skin colour?
If the 6 year old is in the country illegally⌠deport (parents can choose to go with them.)
If the parents are in the country illegally and popped out a baby under the mentally retarded (in this day and age) birthright interpretation. Deport the parents and let them choose to take their baby (or 6 year old child) with them. What is so hard to understand?
1 Like
Separating a minor from their parents and then deporting them is a grave injustice. Families who are in the country illegally should always be kept together and treated humanely while being sent back to their home country.
What theyâre talking about are those families trying to exhaust every loophole possible and appeal to emotion of the dumbest/weakest of society.
I.e. They will refuse to consent to take their citizen child with them knowing full well their child will be separated from them as it will appeal to the emotions of the dumbest in society.
2 Likes
Comfy123 and Quasashao challenge of the day: defend this.
https://www.npr.org/2026/02/24/nx-s1-5723914/ice-iran-deporatation-adoption-adoptee-veteran
There is more to this story.
My first question would be why isnât she a US citizenâŚ? The shit we give Taiwan for not giving citizenship to Americans⌠why didnât America give citizenship to the adoptive child? That is something that happens almost instantly in Australia and other countries
1 Like
Adoptees should automatically acquire the citizenship of their adoptive parents.
2 Likes
Exactly. Thatâs why I think there is far more to this story.
But it is typical liberal nonsense to give half a story.
2 Likes
If you read the story it explains that the law granting automatic citizenship to foreign adoptees under 18 was only passed in 2000. Sheâs in her 50s now and would have been in her 20s or 30s when the law passed. The law is not retroactive. She only found out that she wasnât a citizen when she tried to apply for a passport.
I believe Tommy had a similar fall through the cracks regarding ROC citizenship, being born before 1980.
She wasnât denied automatic citizenship under the 2000 Child Citizenship Act because of age/lack of retroactivity but because she entered the U.S. on the wrong type of visa.
Most international adoptees receive automatic citizenship thanks to the 2000 Child Citizenship Act. But the law excludes those who were already adults when the legislation passed or adoptees who entered the U.S. on the wrong type of visa, which is what happened to the California woman
.
1 Like
Well you can hardly blame her. She was 2.
Hereâs a challenge for you. Quote anything I said which even remotely implies I blame her for anything.
So we can agree that this is an injustice that needs to be rectified and that she shouldnât be deported. Glad weâre all on the same page.
Good question. But Iâm pretty sure that is Millerâs endgame: deport all 11 million immigrants from the U.S., never mind the disastrous effects it will have on the economy.