Seventh anniversary of 9/11, and justice still nowhere to be found (unless big brother’s invasions, murders and resource theft satisfy some twisted demonic war-mongering enthusiasm).
This article is quite long, but some here may want to dive in and understand some of the lies purported by the official 9/11 conspiracy theory.
McCain and Obama have both sold out to the official conspiracy theory - regardless of the fallacies or ramifications. I seriously doubt either of them could lead an America awoken to the internal lies and betrayal of the real 9/11 perps. Interestingly enough, independents Nader and McKinney both admit a new and truthful investigation is absolutely required into those fateful attacks.
[quote=“David Ray Griffin”]
Was America Attacked by Muslims on 9/11?
09/09/08
…
The assumption that America was attacked by Muslims on 9/11 also lies behind the widespread perception of Islam as an inherently violent religion and therefore of Muslims as guilty until proven innocent. This perception surely contributed to attempts to portray Obama as a Muslim, which was lampooned by a controversial cartoon on the July 21, 2008, cover of The New Yorker.
As could be illustrated by reference to many other post-9/11 developments, including as spying, torture, extraordinary rendition, military tribunals, America’s new doctrine of preemptive war, and its enormous increase in military spending, the assumption that the World Trade Center and the Pentagon were attacked by Muslim hijackers has had enormous negative consequences for both international and domestic issues.1
Is it conceivable that this assumption might be false? Insofar as Americans and Canadians would say “No,” they would express their belief that this assumption is not merely an “assumption” but is instead based on strong evidence. When actually examined, however, the proffered evidence turns out to be remarkably weak. I will illustrate this point by means of 16 questions.
- Were Mohamed Atta and the Other Hijackers Devout Muslims?
… - Do Authorities Have Hard Evidence of Osama bin Laden’s Responsibility for 9/11?
… - Was Evidence of Muslim Hijackers Provided by Phone Calls from the Airliners?
… - Was the Presence of Hijackers Proved by a Radio Transmission “from American 11”?
… - Did Passports and a Headband Provide Evidence that al-Qaeda Operatives Were on the Flights?
… - Did the Information in Atta’s Luggage Prove the Responsibility of al-Qaeda Operatives?
… - Were al-Qaeda Operatives Captured on Airport Security Videos?
… - Were the Names of the “Hijackers” on the Passenger Manifests?
… - Did DNA Tests Identify Five Hijackers among the Victims at the Pentagon?
… - Has the Claim That Some of the “Hijackers” Are Still Alive Been Debunked?
… - Is There Positive Evidence That No Hijackers Were on the Planes?
… - Were bin Laden and al-Qaeda Capable of Orchestrating the Attacks?
… - Could Hani Hanjour Have Flown Flight 77 into the Pentagon?
… - Would an al-Qaeda Pilot Have Executed that Maneuver?
… - Could al-Qaeda Operatives Have Brought Down the World Trade Center Buildings?
… - Would al-Qaeda Operatives Have Imploded the Buildings?
…
Conclusion
All the proffered evidence that America was attacked by Muslims on 9/11, when subjected to critical scrutiny, appears to have been fabricated. If that is determined indeed to be the case, the implications would be enormous. Discovering and prosecuting the true perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks would obviously be important. The most immediate consequence, however, should be to reverse those attitudes and policies that have been based on the assumption that America was attacked by Muslims on 9/11.[/quote]