Why Bilinguals Are Smarter

[quote]SPEAKING two languages rather than just one has obvious practical benefits in an increasingly globalized world. But in recent years, scientists have begun to show that the advantages of bilingualism are even more fundamental than being able to converse with a wider range of people. Being bilingual, it turns out, makes you smarter. It can have a profound effect on your brain, improving cognitive skills not related to language and even shielding against dementia in old age.

This view of bilingualism is remarkably different from the understanding of bilingualism through much of the 20th century. Researchers, educators and policy makers long considered a second language to be an interference, cognitively speaking, that hindered a child’s academic and intellectual development.

They were not wrong about the interference: there is ample evidence that in a bilingual’s brain both language systems are active even when he is using only one language, thus creating situations in which one system obstructs the other. But this interference, researchers are finding out, isn’t so much a handicap as a blessing in disguise. It forces the brain to resolve internal conflict, giving the mind a workout that strengthens its cognitive muscles.

Bilinguals, for instance, seem to be more adept than monolinguals at solving certain kinds of mental puzzles. In a 2004 study by the psychologists Ellen Bialystok and Michelle Martin-Rhee, bilingual and monolingual preschoolers were asked to sort blue circles and red squares presented on a computer screen into two digital bins — one marked with a blue square and the other marked with a red circle.

In the first task, the children had to sort the shapes by color, placing blue circles in the bin marked with the blue square and red squares in the bin marked with the red circle. Both groups did this with comparable ease. Next, the children were asked to sort by shape, which was more challenging because it required placing the images in a bin marked with a conflicting color. The bilinguals were quicker at performing this task.

The collective evidence from a number of such studies suggests that the bilingual experience improves the brain’s so-called executive function — a command system that directs the attention processes that we use for planning, solving problems and performing various other mentally demanding tasks. These processes include ignoring distractions to stay focused, switching attention willfully from one thing to another and holding information in mind — like remembering a sequence of directions while driving.

Why does the tussle between two simultaneously active language systems improve these aspects of cognition? Until recently, researchers thought the bilingual advantage stemmed primarily from an ability for inhibition that was honed by the exercise of suppressing one language system: this suppression, it was thought, would help train the bilingual mind to ignore distractions in other contexts. But that explanation increasingly appears to be inadequate, since studies have shown that bilinguals perform better than monolinguals even at tasks that do not require inhibition, like threading a line through an ascending series of numbers scattered randomly on a page.

The key difference between bilinguals and monolinguals may be more basic: a heightened ability to monitor the environment. “Bilinguals have to switch languages quite often — you may talk to your father in one language and to your mother in another language,” says Albert Costa, a researcher at the University of Pompeu Fabra in Spain. “It requires keeping track of changes around you in the same way that we monitor our surroundings when driving.” In a study comparing German-Italian bilinguals with Italian monolinguals on monitoring tasks, Mr. Costa and his colleagues found that the bilingual subjects not only performed better, but they also did so with less activity in parts of the brain involved in monitoring, indicating that they were more efficient at it.

The bilingual experience appears to influence the brain from infancy to old age (and there is reason to believe that it may also apply to those who learn a second language later in life). [/quote]
nytimes.com/2012/03/18/opini … aZOmnO03qA

Cool. :thumbsup:

Interesting stuff - I’ve thought that it must be good for my daughter’s brain to be managing 2 languages.
I accept the fact now that she’s so good at code-switching (the ability to go back and forth between Chinese & English, in back-to-back sentences), but it often blows folks back in the UK away when they hear her doing that.

Although I was talking to friend of the wife’s last week, and asked her how good my kid’s Chinese actually was. She said that when she’s talking in full sentences, then it’s fine. But when she code-switched within a sentence (perhaps she’d speak English and then find she wanted to say a word that she only knows in Chinese), that Chinese word isn’t so clear. That could be because she’s copying me there, I often speak English and then throw a Chinese word into the mix - usually really badly.

There are also a lot of stupid ignorant bilinguals…

Being intelligent is being intelligent.

[quote=“tango42”]There are also a lot of stupid ignorant bilinguals…

Being intelligent is being intelligent.[/quote]
Right. Scientists shouldn’t study anything. Either you are or you aren’t. :unamused:

Would be interesting to know if being trilingual then gives even further advantages or maybe that just makes things confusing.
Also, it would be interesting to know if it makes any difference what the two languages are. Would English+French be equivalent to English+Chinese?

[quote=“elburro”]Would be interesting to know if being trilingual then gives even further advantages or maybe that just makes things confusing.
Also, it would be interesting to know if it makes any difference what the two languages are. Would English+French be equivalent to English+Chinese?[/quote]
Right, linguistically close languages or ones totally different. It’s an interesting field of study for sure. :thumbsup:

[quote=“tango42”]There are also a lot of stupid ignorant bilinguals…

Being intelligent is being intelligent.[/quote]No. There are many modes of intelligence. For example…

[quote]the unusual way that an Australian aboriginal group understands spatial direction: everything is spoken of in terms of the cardinal points on the compass, and the words for “left” and “right” aren’t used at all. These aborigines, amazingly, know at all times which way is north, south, east and west.

A speaker of this language, Mr. Deutscher wrote, might warn you to “look out for that big ant just north of your foot,” or tell you he left something “on the southern edge of the western table.”[/quote]…that’s an form of spatial intelligence. Doesn’t mean a speaker of the language will be better than average working with numbers, written language, or social interaction.

But it’s hard to believe that learning the language wouldn’t reshape and expand one’s mind. Easy to believe that learning a second or third language would build on an individual’s native intelligence, leaving them… smarter than they were before. :homer:

It does. I have frequently quoted that research that explains how it works, which is basically like duplicating the hard disk capacity of your brain, and creating new, expanded, and plentiful connections between them. In a bilingual’s brain, there are more connections, and hence, reasoning can be made faster and along different lines of thought than monolinguals. That is why it was advocated, for instance, that Math or Science be taught in the secondary language, for further enhancement.

Think about the brain as a muscle and getting twice the exercise.

But true, different kinds of “intelligence” was the latest trend in education last time I glimpsed into that field. Dunno what is the “fashionable theory” right now, but that one was pretty hippy to me. :smiley:

In English, nobody likes to talk about intelligence; it’s always hard not to sound smug, bitter, self-pitying, etc.

This is not the case for all languages and cultures, of course… but it is difficult to talk frankly about intelligence (even in this practical connection to languages, etc.) without offending people.

A large part of what we gain through multi-lingualism is in the category of “remembering” and “recollecting” things; it does (apparently) make you more resistant to the progress of Alzheimer’s disease (a rather facile factoid that google will immediately reveal to you in a thousand news-sources).

As many people have already commented, being very good at remembering something under multiple names, in multiple writing-systems, etc. etc., does not make you more intelligent.

I have been disappointed many times (e.g.) with westerners who became fluent in a particular Asian language who were nevertheless “stupid” in really disregarding what people said to them (dismissing what they were hearing, etc.) with the result being that it seemed as if I had better comprehension than they did, after a very short period studying the same language. In reality, my comprehension was extremely limited, but I was more disciplined in really listening to what people said (and in refusing to impose my own expectations onto their answers, etc.).

I will offer a very shallow example that is drawn directly from experience (translated into English), but I think many of you will have witnessed things like this before, in crossing various cultural barriers, language barriers and so on.

Western man: “You guys eat this stuff raw, right?”
Asian local: “N-no… no, we cook it in the fire…”
Western man: “But it’s safe to eat this raw, right?”
Asian local: “No, we never eat it raw.”
Western man: “But just as a snack sometimes, it’s fine to just pick this up and eat it raw, right?”
Asian local: “Well… I don’t know, but I suppose I’ve seen drunk people breaking into small pieces and mixing it with hot chili-peppers…”
Western man: Turns to face me and says, in English, “See, it’s perfectly safe to eat these things raw.”

The westerner in that example really had attained an extremely high level of ability in the language, and yet he remained (frankly) an idiot, who misunderstood many things directly in front of his face (in this way) while I observed him.

Improving your ability to remember and recollect things is powerful. If you’re smart, but struggle with odd pauses and silences when you can’t summon information to mind, you’ll be perceived as stupid.

Conversely, does it really make you more intelligent to memorize all the brushstrokes in every Chinese radical? My honest answer is no. A large part of what we memorize in any given language is really meaningless; this is perhaps especially true of Chinese (due to the writing system, etc.).

Nevertheless, I completely assume that I will force my own child to memorize all of those brushstrokes.

Terms like “smart” or “intelligent” can mean different things to different people. The example of raw food you gave seems to be more of a common sense issue, not necessarily the same as being intelligent. Just off the top of my mind, I can imagine a few aspects of Chinese working the minds of speakers of western languages in different ways, for instance, the numeric system, which works in sets of four digits, as opposed to three, and all the new metaphors, chengyu and whatever that can used to describe the world in new ways. I don’t this bilinguals are going to be geniuses, and I don’t think that’s the point. I think perhaps, they’re more like artists with broader/more versatile palettes.

I’m not sure how true this is. I graduated in 1993 and it was already well-established that learning a second language was not an “interference” in any way, and that the cognitive benefits far outweigh any possible disadvantages (such as being slower to acquire language fluency). In fact the human brain seems designed for two languages - it’s got a spare “hard drive” (to use the above metaphor) that sits there unused in monolinguals. Functional MRI at the time was a lot less developed than it is now, but psychologists had already observed that each language gets it’s own physical location. A third language doesn’t (it has to share) but this appears to have no practical ramifications. This is all vague recollection now - it was 20 years ago and I’ve not bothered to keep up with the latest research.

The idea that multilinguals are more intelligent arises, I think, from a theory that language fundamentally affects the way you think. Even when people are thinking out loud - ie., talking or writing - it’s very hard to translate between (for example) Chinese and English because the underlying thoughts being expressed are often very different. The ‘artist’ comparison is a good one. The English speaker has a set of colourful acrylics. The Chinese speaker is a sculptor. The bilingual can not just paint and sculpt - he can do anything in between, and invent new combinations of the two. Of course, there are plenty of really, really bad artists.

Anyway, the idea that a multilingual upbringing interferes with language acquisition is an urban legend propagated by dull people (politicians, mostly) because a kid growing up in that environment doesn’t follow the expected development track. Various things take a little big longer (duh) than they do for monolinguals. That means they can’t be herded along with the rest of the sheeple who, at (say) age 6 are learning about this, that and the other pointless subject in elementary school. And that makes things awfully inconvenient for the men with clipboards who schedule our lives for us.

In reply to Finley, there are many (many!) empirical examples of bilingual education being much worse (for the students) than monolingual, primarily in the context of former British Empire colonies (U.S., Canada, etc.).

I have seen this myself many times, too: children raised who (at the end of high-school) are neither proficient in one language nor the other. Apparently this type of problem is quite easy to “compute” in terms of comparing standardized test-scores, etc. etc.

There are, firstly, problems “on the surface” with such comparisons in a British Empire colony: you can’t talk about “a multilingual upbringing” in the abstract, when you’re comparing (e.g.) Chilean refugees (being raised bilingual) to people living in the same cultural context, speaking English only (who are the descendants of British colonists, with all of the advantages attached to that, etc.).

However, the underlying problem in dealing with this side of the issue is that multilingualism is fundamentally unrelated to formal education, or formal testing. A critique of (e.g.) French-immersion education in Canada (as a formal educational system, with measurable results, in test form) really has nothing to do with (e.g.) someone who develops fluency in several languages through karaoke, through living in a refugee camp, or any other informal method.

I have met many, many people who became bilingual or trilingual in refugee camps. I have met several people who became bilingual or trilingual through karaoke. Unfortunately, both options are closed to me, so I’m stuck with this formal education system… :wink:

This isn’t a valid way to assess the effect of being bilingual. I agree there’s no such thing as a standard “bilingual environment”. However, making allowances for the fact that a bilingual child will take longer to learn to speak fluently, the end result is better. If you drag that same child through an education system designed for monolinguals, then (duh) he’s going to struggle. Because he starts off at a lower level of comprehension, he will slip further and further behind: the education system takes a minor, manageable phenomenon and turns it into a big, horrible deal. This is precisely the problem they’re experiencing in Taiwan. The correct response is not to ban early language instruction, but to start formal schooling later. But that’s anathema to people who think infants should spend every waking moment with their head in a textbook.

This isn’t a valid way to assess the effect of being bilingual. I agree there’s no such thing as a standard “bilingual environment”. However, making allowances for the fact that a bilingual child will take longer to learn to speak fluently, the end result is better. If you drag that same child through an education system designed for monolinguals, then (duh) he’s going to struggle. Because he starts off at a lower level of comprehension, he will slip further and further behind: the education system takes a minor, manageable phenomenon and turns it into a big, horrible deal. This is precisely the problem they’re experiencing in Taiwan. The correct response is not to ban early language instruction, but to start formal schooling later. But that’s anathema to people who think infants should spend every waking moment with their head in a textbook.[/quote]

It’s very, very rare. You’ve seen it many times? Examples, please.

It’s always good for a discussion wind-up, and the MOE get off on it :laughing: .

You guys know how to use google, and so does the M.O.E.

Like everything else in the field of “education studies”, there’s a prolix literature available examining all sides of the issue, and many debates within and surrounding it. Example:

Does the research show bilingual education [to be] ineffective? Basing their conclusions on an analysis of 72 studies that they considered to be methodologically acceptable, Russell and Baker conclude that the research evidence “does not support transitional bilingual education as a superior form of instruction for limited English proficient children” (1996: 7). They conclude, for example, that in the case of English reading comprehension, transitional bilingual education was superior to submersion in 22% of the studies, worse in 33% and there was no difference in 45% of the studes (60 studies were examined).
p. 58 of Linguistics, Language Acquisition, and Language Variation: Current Trends and Future Prospects, Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics, James E. Alatis (ed.), Georgetown University Press, 1996.

So what?

I thought the thread was about the relative merits (or otherwise) of being bilingual. How badly educationalists manage to screw up the process (which appears to be what that study addresses) is beside the point. That study was specifically interested in non-English speakers being funneled through the English-speaking US educational system. The paper is available online here:

jstor.org/discover/10.2307/4 … 2573595853

And being able to Google is no substitute for being able to critically assess what you read. Millions of kids grow up every year in countries where it’s normal or essential to know two or more languages/dialects. Surely you’re not arguing that they’re all 'tarded because of that?

If you trawl the internet, you’re bound to find something to back up your argument. And statistics can easily be manipulated.

I don’t think bilinguals are necessarily more intelligent than monolinguals, but as I said before, having the extra language “may” help them with things like lateral thinking, among other things. I think this thread may have been better named “advantages of being bilingual”.

A lot of this is going to come down to personal feelings and circumstances. I have recently moved to Taiwan, with my Taiwanese wife, so my son could grow up bilingual. I strongly believe this will be a big asset and wish I had the opportunity growing up. As for falling behind other, many adults underestimate the plasticity of a child’s brain. My son is three years old and we’ve been here for just 3 months. In the UK, my family and I spoke to my son in English, and his English is up to standard for a three year old. My wife didn’t converse with him much in Mandarin, even though I constantly asked her to… she just spoke a few sentences, like - it’s time to brush your teeth, it’s time for bed etc. He could understand these simple sentences, but he never replied in Chinese. I stressed the importance that I only speak to him in English, and my wife only speaks to him in Chinese (I’d browsed some books on bilingualism), but it never happened how I planned. Now we’re back in Taiwan, and after being immersed in a Chinese environment for 3 months, his Chinese is as good as his English. Well, for the first 6 weeks he said little in Chinese, and then one day he just started using Chinese with everyone except me. He did go to a summer school mandarin course at Lih-Jen school, which helped (mainly just playing, but in Chinese). This isn’t anything particularly special, I’ve heard other cases of this kind of thing. Children have amazing potential for learning languages. I hope I’m making the right decision to have my children raised bilingually.

Re: “And being able to Google is no substitute for being able to critically assess what you read. Millions of kids grow up every year in countries where it’s normal or essential to know two or more languages/dialects. Surely you’re not arguing that they’re all 'tarded because of that?”

Who are you talking to here? Did you actually read any of my former messages?

You’re assigning an opinion to me that I’ve never expressed, and then reviling me for it.

Why not actually read what I’ve stated on the matter, or else (if you just feel like stating extreme opinions for your own amusement) address your arguments to a general audience, rather than pretending that the respond or relate to anything I’ve said before it.