Yeh, but you being pretty annoyed isnāt really a legal opinion.
Iād be interested to know how Authoritay would react in such a case.
Would they take the āNo real harm done, Ma fanā position, or would they throw the book (if there is a book for this) at you, to defend the sanctity of the private property that they are quite likely to tow away and scrap next week.
My guess is itād be the former at the beat cop level, and prosecution to the full extent of the law if it got to the courts, but I donāt know.
Hypothetically, itād almost be worth turning myself in to find out.
OTOH, the oil mix hypothetically used would be protective and long term the vegetable oil component polymerises by oxidation to form a sort of paint.
Thats quite a few irrelevancies-in-context youāve introduced so far, but I suppose you can have your own set of hypotheticals if you really want them.
If I was treating this type of surface rust on my own vehicle, I would abrade the rust with aluminium foil, finishing off by using straight vegetable oil as a binder, This forms a slow-setting aluminium paint in situ which is quite effective at preventing further rust.
I wouldnāt do that in this case because (a) it takes too long, (one inevitably attracts a pack of barking stray dogs, Taiwans Guardians of Conventional Behaviour, doing this sort of thing at night) and (b) it alters the appearance of the vehicle,
Its just possible (though very unlikely) that the owner would specifically want to preserve the "āpatinaā of his old truck, Some old car enthusiasts use straight boiled linseed oil for this purpose,
About 27 minutes in
I dunno if you can get linseed in Taiwan. Maybe Tung Oil?
Sunflower oil sets more slowly, and the hypothetical mix used in this case was designed for cavity use, with mineral oil to increase penetration and further retard setting, so heavy rain or solvent might shift it off surface rust.
Sure, but then I didnāt make a hypothetical āHelp me decide what to do?ā (Apparently as some kind of Adam Smithian rational actor in my own material self interest) post.
I made a hypothetical āIāve already done itā post, (Adam Smith does not/need not apply) and invited comment (or speculation, since Iād guess no one really knows) as to the likely (criminal) legal position.
Frivolous civil prosecution (or not so frivolous baseball bat chastisement) are maybe more likely, though theyād still have to catch me.
They wouldnāt dismiss it nor āthrow the book at you.ā Theyād view it as property damage and/or trespassing and a lot would depend on whether the owner of the truck you āfairiedā wants to press charges.
I would suggest retiring as a āRust Fairy.ā Itās a service no one asked for and one that risks adverse consequences for you. Itās also one of the most bewildering things Iāve read in the Legal forum.
One thing that comes to mind, where I come from, if I see someone pouring shit on my car, Iām not thinking āoh how nice, heās helping me to prevent rustā but āthat mf poured shit on my car!ā and assume itās probably about as damaging as hydrochloric acid. I wonder how proving your good intent might go. Also you might tend to be blamed for any existing rust, dents, or whatever seemed convenient.
I think the moral of the story is when dealing with any personal property ask the owner if you can do whatever it is you are about to do. Or ask him to do something about the rust and if he says he canāt afford to offer to pay for the supplies for it.
But if you are just scrubbing someoneās car and spray painting it, 99% of the owners are going to think you are vandalizing their property, or worse, trying to steal it.
To get somewhat silly,maybe theyāre developing a patina for a cool rat rod? more seriously, if it wasnāt abandoned, I wouldnāt want anyone putting diesel and hydraulic fluid on my car, no matter how ratty they thought it was. and it certainly can, at minimum, stain the paint if left on.
Thereās a law on vandalism. Itās ęÆęē½Ŗ
I donāt know if this is something the owner needs to press charges on or the government does, but thereās also civil suit for damages.
A person who abandon, destroys, damages, or renders useless a thing belonging to another which is not specified in the two preceding articles and causes injury to the public or another shall be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than two years, short-term imprisonment, or a fine of not more than fifteen thousand dollars.
Iām a little unclear what they mean by ācauses injuryā, āč¶³ä»„ēę害ę¼å ¬ē¾ęä»äŗŗč ā in Chinese. Anyway I guess this is the worst?
How would they even find you? What are they going to do? Run around the whole country with the video of you, and stop people in the streets and ask if they know who you are?
If the owner reports it to the police they will find you. They can run facial recognition and compare it to your arc or whatever. So probably a good idea to wear a mask. They are very efficient at catching criminals here.
Applying stuff to something not belonging to you, without the owners permission, would qualify as damage. That is if he wants to press charges. Always ask the owner permission if youāre going to do rust fairy thing. And definitely settle up if he catches you because then he probably wonāt press charges. You donāt know why the car is rusted, maybe he likes the look. He sees you put something on the car panel it might as well be acid for all he cares. Thatās not to mention improper rust removal would actually damage things.
My point is, you donāt do anything to peopleās properties without asking their permission. Itās called respect. You donāt so much as touch it if you can avoid it.
Only material one there I could possibly hypothetically be guilty of in this case would be ādamagesā, and that would be a huge, contentious and frankly ludicrous stretch.
If ācausing injuryā extends to mental distress, that could of course be claimed, but the āandā (in English, at least) implies both have to be established. On that basis I ought to have a good chance of walking.
But I reckon they might āmake an exampleā anyway.
(The cool rat rod aspect is sort of acknowledged above with the video link, and is a reason for using oil, which has minimal effect on the appearance of the vehicle)