Well, that’s a bloody irritation and no mistake! Kind of defeated the entire purpose of my post.
[quote=“sandman”]Well, that’s a bloody irritation and no mistake! Kind of defeated the entire purpose of my post.[/quote]You mean they can’t go on until infinity?
I never realised that, are you sure?
I never realised that, are you sure?[/quote]That’s what I want to know.
Its true!
Its true![/quote]
Why is this not in Fun & Games?
Surely it’s a game, no?
Its true![/quote]
Why is this not in Fun & Games?
Surely it’s a game, no?[/quote]
“nobody expects the Spansh Inquisition!”
I think we can change this - any preferences on how many there should be? Or do you think there shouldn’t be any limit?
Three is good. Stops people nitpicking and forensically examining a post until it disappears up it’s own hole. IMVIO.
I think this limit is fine.
But as long as you’re asking, I think we should vote on the Tigerman-style of quoting. I love Tigerman, don’t get me wrong, but I can’t stand his re-buttal style, the way he cuts up a poster in IP, man… LOL
There should be a limit to how many pieces you can cut up someone’s post into.
Probably not a realistic request, but I needed to vent.
I hope T-man reads this. Love ya, dude!
deleted
Wow how many quotes do you have to do to get deleted?
There should be a limit to how many arguments you can win, also. To make it fair for others.
ok
Shit! Does that count as one? How many do I have left now?