[quote=“Hokwongwei”][quote=“sofun”]the proof is obviously based on blackmailing a witness into making false testimony.
Some of the forum members obviously consumed a lot of TVBS and China Times. They are a little bit behind in terms of information. I would have been more understanding if this year was 2010.[/quote]
I’m calling you out here. Many of your points are valid and many of your beliefs are, I believe, correct, but your style of argumentation is just so infuriating I find myself inclined to disagree with you even when I don’t really want to. Anything can be explained away with a conspiracy theory. Chen Shui-bian never stole a penny – it was a KMT conspiracy! There was never any such thing as Comfort Women – KMT lies! China is actually a legal territory of Japan – anything else is misinformation fed to you by the KMT! Dinosaurs never existed – their fossils were put here by God to test our faith!
Oh wait, that last one is a little off topic. Well, the argumentation style is the same. I just can’t get behind arguments like that, or people who make arguments based on 3-4 very biased and closed-minded media sources. On top of that is the sheer arrogance of “I’m right, and you’re not right because you don’t know as much as I do.” When discussing with sofun, it’s never valid to hold an opposing point of view. Hell, sometimes it’s not even valid to hold the same point of view.
If this is inappropriate for this forum, mods please do as you will, but I just wanted to put that out there.[/quote]
That’s right. It is my style.
A couple of posts earlier a forum member questioned whether I have been reading PTT. I’m not saying that’s not an invalid way of arguing or anything. But it seemed to me that was generally accepted as a valid way of exchanging point of views, I don’t see why my suggestion some forum members reading ChinaTimes are a big problem.
There shouldn’t be any double-standard.
edit : It was Gain. By the way I hold no grudge against him. I just thought that if it’s okay for him, it’s okay for me too.