I have 3 interviews next week and all the schools mentioned that I will have to do a 15-mins demo lesson.
I thought I would make up my own one, but they said that they will give me about half an hour to review the teaching material, right before the demo. I only know the age of the kids and - in one case - that I will teach on material to prepare the final exam for summer camp class.
All three schools said the same thing? Are they all kindergartens? 30 minutes preparation is probably the maximum they are used to.
Get the kidsâ chairs into a horseshoe and make sure you engage each of them while drilling. Be careful about legality depending upon your work rights.
Yes, and 15 minutes is standard for that and buxibans. It usually is an interruption on the actual teacherâs class time. Once a school asked me to do an hour and I ended up walking out after the âevaluatorâ left for awhile and I decided that, while there was probably and actual job, they really wanted to say theyâd had a foreign teacher in that day.
For one thing, usually you get paid after you finish a job, so if you said âits just an unpaid demoâ, theres be no evidence of your lying or not. âThis foreigner is just doing a demoâ is a classic line by cram schools that are getting busted for long-term illegal employment of foreigners that dont have work permits. There are too many other discussions on this subject on this site for me to go into further detail.
But actually, im pretty sure that any work, paid or not, requires a work permit. So that time I grabbed some trash bags with some friends and we cleaned up the beach (before I had an APRC) was âworking without a permitâ and therefore technically illegal. Obviously immigration has better things to do, but if weâd posted all over social media about it and someone was having a bad day, we could have gotten in huge trouble (based on âthe letter of the lawâ)
Thank you Tando for the links, and can anyone translate the following in English:
"⌠Unless, the âteachingâ behaviors of the foreign teachers without students on site, otherwise all are read as âthe provision of the labor servicesâ,
and cram schools shall follow the rule in Article 43 in the Employment Service Act to apply for the work permit for the foreign teachers first."
Iâm no lawyer, but I can attempt to translate the pidgin English into more colloquial and hopefully grammatically-correct English, while simultaneously attempting to preserve the original sentence structure and word order as much as possible.
âWith the exception of those âteachingâ activities that are conducted by foreign teachers without students on site, all other such âteachingâ activities are considered as âprovision of labor servicesâ, and as such, cram schools shall follow the rule in Article 43 in the Employment Service A.â
In other words,
As an aside, was the original quoted text really that difficult to understand? I would imagine that, as an English teacher, you would be required to understand and interpret poorly-written English texts from students, whose English level would probably be far below that of the above-quoted textâŚ
Why do you fail to understand such a basic concept of working? Even a demo in a classroom with students is âworkingâ and if you do not have an APRC or JFRV or student ARC with work rights then working without a work permit is a risk. It does not matter whether your are paid or not.
A person on a tourist visa is not allowed to work, paid or unpaid.
This one tried to use a tourist visa to enter the USA for work. Yes she was to be paid. Same for some Australian journalists who flew to the USA to cover an event and tried same thing. Tourist visa instead of getting proper visas.