History has an uncomfortable habit of repeating itself, and the “Passport Bros” movement—where Western men travel abroad to find “traditional” wives—feels eerily similar to colonial exploitation.
For centuries, colonizers invaded foreign lands, not just for resources, but also for the women. Today, they carry passports instead of guns and HIV along with other STDs instead of the common cold.
Colonization has been going on since antiquity, and your attempt to characterise something that’s been happening for 1000s of years all over the world as an invasion of foreign lands for resources and women sugests your mental picture is largely derived from Disney’s Pocahontas, or maybe that Kevin Costner movie.
You would have to go on a colony by colony basis.
And no, unless “passport bros” are establishing their own settlements in far off lands, they’re not colonists.
No, Passport Bros aren’t building settlements, but their behavior mirrors colonial exploitation. They leverage wealth disparities to control relationships, fetishise women under the guise of “traditional values,” and strip them of autonomy by creating dependency. It’s nothing more than modern day exploitation.
I am one of the few who can proudly say I met mine in my home country and never had trouble dating in my home country… I know many who can only date in these third world countries.
Meeting someone naturally in your home country isn’t even in the same league as flying into a “third world” country with a wallet full of foreign currency to meet an impoverished local girl.
Yes, met her in my home country of Taiwan (I didn’t travel to the Philippines to meet her nor did I plan to date a Filipina). She is also now wealthier than me through her online business…
So by your definition though… she traveled to Taiwan, she has far more money than me… is she a “passport bro?”