Bondi Beach terrorist attack

Oh, I see, so you’re saying Israel is running death camps and gas chambers now?

Because that’s what inferred intent looked like in the Holocaust: systematic round-ups, extermination camps, industrial killing. If that were happening to Palestinians, the genocide claim wouldn’t be debated, it would be undeniable.

Absent that, you’re not inferring intent from evidence.

I think the father and son were in Davao City whoring, warming up for those 72 virgins.

9/11 style.

Was October 7 genocide?

I did not expect this from Debbie Wasserman-Shultz, possibly the biggest Israel shill.

NewsNation: What’s the bigger problem, Islamophobia or Jihadism?

Wasserman-Shultz: Trump

Hope this is a good indicator of where the Democratic Party is headed.

BTW, Vittert doesn’t know what an “open-ended question” is.

There are no official German documents from WW2 showing anyone was ever killed using a gas chamber in a German concentration camp.

They don’t need camps. Israel has effectively turned Gaza into one big open air prison camp where they carry out mass killings of civilians. Israeli data show that ~83% of deaths in Gaza are civilian.

Strange, considering Trump is Jewish.

What? No, yes there are. That’s a wild take.

Now this is in alignment with the truth. It’s not a war - it’s a genocide, very clearly.

There aren’t any.

I voted for a Jewish president (Jill Stein).

Not the orange hobo.

Orange hobo is Jewish too.

Are you actually denying that Jews were exterminated in gas chambers at Auschwitz and other concentration camps? This is beyond well documented and denying it is a form of Holocaust denial. This is something that is not even up for debate.

w

What do you think all that Zyklon-B was used for? I can’t believe we’re even having this discussion here, but it lines up with your agenda of downplaying antisemitism at every turn. I just didn’t know it’d include the Holocaust as well. Evidence and documentation for the Holocaust - Wikipedia

Did you actually read what I wrote?

So your process of argument is:

A: “It’s not a genocide and there would be a paper trail and actions stating such"

B: “There is no paper documentation of such acts” [insinuating that incriminating evidence was destroyed or hidden]

Is that about right? Or is your position that “X" did not take place because no documentation exists?

/s?

C: Because there are no official German documents from WW2 showing anyone was ever killed using a gas chamber in a German concentration camp, that the courts had to use evidence inferred by other means.

Likewise, there will be no Israeli official orders or documents linking them to the current genocide in Gaza, and it needs to be inferred by other evidence.

A photo of Trump at the Wailing Wall/Western Wall of the Temple Mount in Jerusalem is your evidence?

Trump paid homage to a culturally significant site during his trip to Israel. That doesn’t make him Jewish.