The first part of your statement is incorrect. Boris Johnson went to Eton and Oxford. Neither of these institutions confers the relevant education or skills to be a clown.
But then how will the BBC, the Gruniad etc etc survive? They need to paint him as a retard and/or a threat to democracy to attract some clicks. He also has potential because his name sounds a bit Russian, so if you thought that the Trump Russia Conspiracy was idiotic you may want to buckle up and get ready for endless leaks from anonymous sources familiar with the matter that show undeniable proofs of BJ being a Russian puppet.
He says he will try to get rid of Sadiq Khan so I think he’s all right. No one has yet to point to anything specific and concrete that’s negative about him.
The election of Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson to Prime Minister is the latest in an uninterrupted list of PMs, going back to Gordon Brown (2007), who weren’t selected by the public but, rather, were selected by their respective parties or managed to cobble enough support from politicians to prop themselves up without a public mandate. Furthermore, over half the members of the Conservative Party (the insignificant group who elected him) are over 55 years old and over a third of them are over 65 years old.
Is this the “democracy” we’re always told we have?
Excuse my ignorance of the particulars of British politics in regards to how a PM comes into power. But for example, federalism in an important concept in the US and we utilize an electoral college to elect the president as a constitutional republic and not direct democracy. And for good reasons imo.