[quote=“Abacus”][quote=“Ducked”]
Other possible answers would be:
(a) Because I say so, and its my class. (b) Because he’s in the text book. American English File 3.
[/quote]
I disagree with Icon for the most part
A) it’s not your class, it’s your students class
B) I usually find the topics and people in textbooks to be of little interest to students. There will be initial interest because che is a recognizable symbol but once it becomes a latin American history lesson they will become bored. The other problem is that a lot of the good Che material is in Spanish and subtitled in English. You aren’t improving listening skills with that material.
My thoughts on Che: he stood up against people that were doing terrible things but his ‘sucesses’ made things worse for everyone, rich and poor. And he did the same terrible things that his opposition was doing. I’m not sure how he can be idolized other than he does look pretty cool on a T-shirt.[/quote]
A) No, it is his class. I fundamentally disagree with this whole notion of the teacher as merely a facilitator, or whatever the current parlance is. In his case, his students are actually adults, so I think the dynamic should be slightly different there, though the teacher should still obviously be the teacher. In children’s classes, my attitude is simply this: you’re the child, you don’t get an opinion.
B) As he said, “You can’t build a syllabus on “I like play computer.” and if all you have to go on as a starting point is the revolutionary chique merchandising, then that’s better than nothing.”
I personally wouldn’t give a lesson on Che to kids because it’s probably way beyond them and because it would probably end up being highly ideological one way or the other. However, what I think is probably the worst thing about the EFL industry in this country (which goes from the sublime to the ridiculous when contrasted with the rest of the education system here) is that the foreigner is expected to have everyone fully amped at all times. Then everyone complains that kids have short attention spans. Here’s a novel (or old, depending upon your perspective) approach to being a student: Sit down, shut the fuck up and listen because you might learn something from someone older than you.
So, whilst I may disagree with the OP politically, I don’t accept this wholesale adoption of the Western folly of it being about the kids. Kids wouldn’t know shit from clay on the best of days. Would we let them run the national economy? How about trade talks? What about running a nuclear reactor? Yet we want them to have a partial or major say in curriculum selection and pedagogical design? Madness.