[quote=“Mick”][quote=“TainanCowboy”]Temperature rise halted about 1999 or so. The brief, in earth terms, rise was nothing more than a climate anomaly that happens with regularity. hat much has been firmly proven;ad was hidden/deleted in the warmist “research.”
Really? That has been firmly proven? No wonder you didn’t get why after your comment about how the scientists you linked to, had debunked the CO2 nonsense, (despite the fact they openly state it is a warming gas and has caused warming) I mentioned a comment by Ron Paul where he states evolution is just a theory.
Despite the last 10 years argument being faulty, usually misquoting Phil Jones, based on cherry picked dates, as well as a few other things which become less relevant since 2010 tied with 2005 as being the hottest on record.
But I’m sure youre right, the theory of global warming will be exposed as a fraud and the world will see that you were right, any minute now.[/quote]
Its not just me, although you conviently frget to remember that all I ever wanted was correct and sufficient scientific data to confim the Warmist theory…which never was provided.
And then, there is this new item:
Met Office releases new figures which show no warming in 15 years
Last updated at 5:38 AM on 29th January 2012
“Based on readings from more than 30,000 measuring stations, the data was issued last week without fanfare by the
Met Office and the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit.
It confirms that the rising trend in world temperatures ended in 1997.”
But wait…there’s more!
[i]"CO2 levels have continued to rise without interruption and, in 2007, the Met Office claimed that global warming was about to ‘come roaring back’. It said that between 2004 and 2014 there would be an overall increase of 0.3C. In 2009, it predicted that at least three of the years 2009 to 2014 would break the previous temperature record set in 1998.
So far there is no sign of any of this happening. But yesterday a Met Office spokesman insisted its models were still valid.
‘The ten-year projection remains groundbreaking science. The period for the original projection is not over yet,’ he said.
Dr Nicola Scafetta, of Duke University in North Carolina, is the author of several papers that argue the Met Office climate models show there should have been ‘steady warming from 2000 until now’.[/i]
[i]"Meanwhile, one of America’s most eminent climate experts, Professor Judith Curry of the Georgia Institute of Technology, said she found the Met Office’s confident prediction of a ‘negligible’ impact difficult to understand.
‘The responsible thing to do would be to accept the fact that the models may have severe shortcomings when it comes to the influence of the sun,’ said Professor Curry. As for the warming pause, she said that many scientists ‘are not surprised’.
She argued it is becoming evident that factors other than CO2 play an important role in rising or falling warmth, such as the 60-year water temperature cycles in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans.
‘They have insufficiently been appreciated in terms of global climate,’ said Prof Curry. When both oceans were cold in the past, such as from 1940 to 1970, the climate cooled. The Pacific cycle ‘flipped’ back from warm to cold mode in 2008 and the Atlantic is also thought likely to flip in the next few years .
Pal Brekke, senior adviser at the Norwegian Space Centre, said some scientists found the importance of water cycles difficult to accept, because doing so means admitting that the oceans – not CO2 – caused much of the global warming between 1970 and 1997."[/i]
Whats that sound I hear?..is that a big OOPSY!
Also covered very nicely here:
Headlines over solar cycle 25 and potential global cooling
So now, we are back to…
(how very '70s…I hope this does not mean a return of Disco)