That’s not what entrapment means.
Again, it’s sexual assault because 16 year olds cannot consent in this particular instance.
That’s not what entrapment means.
Again, it’s sexual assault because 16 year olds cannot consent in this particular instance.
Word on the street is that he is making big $$$ conducting triad workshops on how to make guns.
Guess he would probably fail the FBI check for an ARC.
do you mean triad and not mafia?
But they can in Taiwan (and in most of the world), so the authorities would have no valid reason to go after him. As noted, the US is unusually conservative. Europeans would apply Bree’s interpretation: creepy, but not a sensible use of police time. Sexual relations, unfortunately, is full of sordid dealings, predatory behaviour, and exploitation, and the law is a blunt instrument for dealing with them. There are plenty of 30-year-old women with the emotional maturity of 12-year-olds, and the law can’t protect them from themselves.
If she lied about her age though there’s an interesting legal conundrum. I was reading somewhere that, under UK law at least, a man who lies about something in order to get into a woman’s pants could (in theory) be successfully prosecuted for rape. Luckily, that particular interpretation isn’t applied too widely since it would leave roughly six men outside of jail to repopulate the earth (two Mormons, one JW, three Quakers) and the entire female workforce paying for the incarceration of the rest. Anyway, if sexual equality before the law is an actual thing, this must surely apply in reverse; but what happens if the girl is legally competent, not legally entitled to consent to sex, and lies to get the deed done? Are they both guilty of rape? If not why not?
It’s fine to have a philosophical debate about the age of consent, but I’m pretty sure he’s broken the law in TX regardless if she’s lied about her age or not.
She also apparently sent him at least one naked picture of herself. Can he get busted for having child pornography now?
Wasn’t some kid prosecuted for having naked pictures of himself on his cellphone, a few years back? I can’t remember the exact story, but I think he was about 16 at the time.
Americans do get awfully hot under the collar about this sort of thing. I reckon Freud would have something to say about that.
Thou rascal beadle, hold thy bloody hand.
Why dost thou lash that whore? Strip thine own back.
Thou hotly lust’st to use her in that kind
For which thou whipp’st her. The usurer hangs the cozener.
Through tattered clothes great vices do appear;
Robes and furred gowns hide all. Plate sin with gold,
And the strong lance of justice hurtless breaks.
Pretty sure the answer is yes…
Do we know if she is hot? And are any of the naked pictures online ?
True or not, for this reason they’d want to see the last of him more than for the sex issue I think.
So if some underage girl wants to get revenge on an older guy, she can just send him a naked picture then tell the cops he has child pornography on his phone?
That seems to be the case
The age of consent is 12 in the Philippines; that doesn’t mean you can go around banging 12 year olds in Taiwan (or any other country). He still broke the law and I can’t believe there are so many people defending this piece of shit. He’s seemingly trying to avoid going back and facing justice so he probably knows he’s fucked.
“Unusually” conservative is a stretch. 16 is still 16, and as previously noted there are Romeo and Juliet provisions in most states so the law really only affects, oh I don’t know, 30 year olds who solicit 16 year olds.
A lot of ‘ifs’ that involve a complete disconnect from the reality of the case.
Probably, if they can prove it, but I’m sure he should be more worried about the statutory rape. Also, the whole paying her $500 opens up a whole new layer of charges involving child prostitution. He’s probably mega-screwed.
Common sense will need to prevail at some point. I feel it’s in short supply around these parts, but come on.
Hell, why bother sending a picture - just say you were assaulted within the last 40 yrs. - seems to do the trick!!
Ha, yeah, women are so lame being victims of sexual assault, harassment by assholes, then being dismissed offhand by everybody when they do report it. Why don’t they ever come forward earlier!??!?! We could have dismissed them then!
This is highly suspect. Prosecutors would love to put Cody Wilson away. Think about the camapign to deplatform the “alt right”. What’s the last piece of the puzzle? Hatreon
How is that relevant? He broke the law in Texas, but what he did is not illegal here. You’re describing the reverse scenario.
In any case, I don’t think that’s true. The Philippines is backward, but not that backward. It’s 18, isn’t it? Copied from the Americans?
Not defending him. Just pointing out that there’s a world of difference between being a creep and being a rapist.
Um yes. The point being, if he had done the same thing here (or practically anywhere else) he would not have broken the law.
Just pointing out that the law can tie itself up in a lot of unresolveable knots when it tries to be too clever.
Anyway … I really doubt this is a set-up. As noted, it would involve TPTB hiring an underage prostitute. Wouldn’t be the first time, but I doubt this guy is worth the potential fallout. It’s not like proper guns aren’t easily available in the US. His 3D-printed things are useless toys.
Wait, is this why people are defending him so hard? He’s some sort of alt righter therefore he’s probably being persecuted and isn’t just a total POS? Brilliant.
EXACTLY.
Are we so sure that this girl even sees herself as a victim of sexual assault? Is she pressing charges? I’m sure she doesn’t want all this negative publicity.
In no way am I defending him. However, in the same breath, so many are making her out to be a “victim” when she herself might not even see it that way. She lied about her age to get what she wanted. Other side of the coin, he could be the victim.