An Atlanta-based biotech company, Micron Biomedical, announced last week that it has successfully concluded the first-ever clinical trial testing of a microarray injection-free vaccine on children as young as 9 months old. This clinical trial was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
If that is true, all I can say is with the amount of money he has, he shouldnât be doing things because they are mandated by a film company.
Apparently. these social media influencers who also pushed the jabs have cancer. Baffling.
Lock downs were useless as well as damaging.
3 Likes
They had to destroy the village to save it.
Supposedly thereâs a bit of a tussle over the release of private debates regarding lockdowns and so on. Frankly, I think Hallett must be in on the game and is merely throwing up a bit of theatre. Thereâs absolutely no way sheâs going to accuse the Eton set of anything worse than being a bit naughty.
I seem to recall this side effect being reported and ignored years ago now:
1 Like
It wasnât exactly ignored, IIRC - it was aggressively struck down as âmisinformationâ, or accompanied by a fact-check banner. Women were told they were just being hysterical. Dunno why theyâre bothering updating the side effects list now, though - the words âstable doorâ and âboltedâ spring to mind.
Looked up that guy ĺĺŁä¸ĺ, Kazuhiro Haraguchi. Apparently he has diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Doubt heâll get anywhere trying to prove it was because of the magic vaccines, although coincidentally Iâve now known two people who died of cancer (in both cases so aggressive that they didnât even suspect it until medical intervention was futile) within the last 18 months. Three if you count another acquaintance whose cancer was in remission and then returned. Coincidence? Could be. People get cancer all the time. But nobodyâs checking.
1 Like
If cancer stats go out of whack it will be obvious, that much is for sure.
It probably wonât be obvious, because in the grand scheme of things the effect will be obscured by statistical noise. Letâs say 1 in 10,000 vaccinated people develop cancer where they would not have done otherwise; well, cancer is so incredibly common, it wouldnât cause anything more than a slight blip in cancer mortality and no observable change in all-cause mortality, so TPTB can pretend itâs nothing to worry about. An extra half a million people developing cancer over (say) two or three years worldwide would not be âobviousâ, for the simple reason that there are already 30 million new cases diagnosed every year, and 10 million or so deaths. And even if an increase were observed, it would be easy to dismiss this as coincidental. Yes, you could pick it out with more intelligent analysis - for example by observing shifts in types of cancer - but I can guarantee nobody is working on that or applying for funding to study it.
If if turns out to be worse than my hypothetical 1 in 10,000, the most likely outcome is that TPTB will simply ignore it and accuse people who mention it as being conspiracy theorists, idiots, or anti-semites - as they have done, repeatedly, with people like Andrew Bridgen every time he tries to mention the off-the-scale excess deaths in Parliament. Most of the vaccine side effects have been dealt with in like manner - either by constructing some figleaf of deniability (âyoung people get myocarditis all the timeâ), by not discussing it at all, or by claiming that âX million lives were savedâ - with the implication that anyone who died as a consequence of vaccination was merely a regrettable but necessary sacrifice.
1 Like
I find it a little hard to believe that if something is happening the result will be a statistically insignificant difference across the board of all types of cancer. As horrible as any single case of cancer is (as I am unfortunately well aware, all is well now however), this will basically mean nothing significant happened. The current narrative leading to this discussion happening at all is âall these people are getting cancer!â which doesnât square with that kind of statistical result.
There is a world of difference between âstatistical significanceâ and clinical significance. The former is simply a rough-and-ready way of describing whether some observation may have arisen by chance.
One thing that really annoyed me about the whole COVID dumpster fire is that the vast majority of the worldâs population have no facility with numbers - particularly large numbers - yet they all suddenly became experts on data science and statistics. If you have a wiggly line (a time series) representing cancer deaths, itâll have a visible long-term trend with superimposed noise. Removing the noise amounts to low-pass filtering, which means you remove short-run events; therefore, if you filter that wiggly line to observe the trend, youâll delete any step change caused by e.g., vaccination. If you donât remove the noise, you canât be certain that the same step change is just ⌠well, noise. If, for example, you have an average of 30 million cases a year with a SD of 0.1 million, 0.1 or 0.2 million new cases a year amounts to maybe two standard deviations and is therefore suspicious, but hardly definitive proof that the COVID vaccination campaign caused a rash of cancer.
It doesnât even help if you can observe an actual effect nice and clearly - letâs say you apply high-pass filtering, effectively deleting the baseline. But if you do that, the noise is still there, and you havenât added any extra information that could help you ascribe causality. Youâve just got a very wiggly line with what looks like a bump in it, and you could find any number of hypotheses to explain the bump.
Underlying every noise-ridden measurement there might be a real effect, but without more sophisticated techniques to observe it, you canât get at the truth; the ultimate reality, to which you donât have accurate access, could be that hundreds of thousands of people are dying where they would not have done in the absence of medical experiments - and that would be clinically significant. It would be clinically significant even if there were only 20 such people in the whole world dying post-vax; in other words, it would be significant to them.
TL;DR the fact that you canât easily measure something doesnât mean it doesnât exist or isnât important. The science of measurement (and hypothesis-testing) is hard. Measuring small numbers in the real world is very hard indeed.
Attorney Aaron Siri is a true hero to anyone affected by vaccine injuries or involved in the medical freedom movement.
Everyone should view his 2-hour testimony on the failure of our federal health agencies. (1/4)
1 Like
I donât recognize any of them and donât want to, and to me itâs totally plausible that jabs contributed to cancer in every case.
But. Thereâs also this:
Just sayinâ.
I always wonder if that guy gets people coming up to him in the street saying âhey Siri, switch the lights off in the bathroomâ. But yeah, heâs been very tenacious. The thing that worries me at this point is that TPTB simply donât care. They know theyâre guilty as hell. And they know theyâre untouchable; theyâre quite literally beyond the reach of the Law. So it doesnât matter what Siri says or how much evidence he has. Theyâll just shout âConspiracy theorist! Ha Ha!â and carry on with the next stage of shaping the reality they desire.
@yyy: people have been saying that for a while re. âlong COVIDâ. Itâs hard to fake cancer (although the girl in the article clearly had a good go) but itâs really easy to fake âbrain fogâ so you can have another six months off work. Thatâs not to suggest thereâs no such thing as post-viral syndrome or possibly some sequelae that are unique to COVID, but I know not a single person who has had anything that could be described as âlong COVIDâ- and yet, apparently 20% of Americans have it. Something just doesnât stack up.
Long Covid is worse than stage 4 lung cancer. Fact!
1 Like
I do wonder how much of this crap is real but unrelated to COVID. Most studies have been unable to find any strong link between having âlong COVIDâ, and having actually had COVID (or a serious bout of COVID). Obviously, then, itâs long something-or-other, but not long COVID. Is it psychosomatic? Stress and depression? Vaccine side effects (Iâve not seen a single study consider that possibility, despite a strong overlap in known symptoms)? Aliens?Chemtrails? Who knows? There seems to be an astounding amount of money being poured into this particular black hole, and precious little to show for it.
Iâve no idea. Iâve no experience of anyone who has died of/with Covid, or who has been hospitalised because of Covid, or who has long Covid. And I know a lot of old people. Iâm a statistical outlier.