I think it’s a more a breakdown of the political/legal system. Look at what happened to Tony Martin. He was a British farmer whose home had been broken into several times. He finally shot 2 burglars killing one. Martin was sentenced to prison and was recently released on parole (over the objections of the parole board).
newarkadvertiser.co.uk/featu … npview.htm
From The Telegraph:
Tony Martin refused leave ‘because of risk to burglars’
By Daniel Foggo
(Filed: 20/07/2003)
Tony Martin, the farmer who killed a criminal who broke into his house, has been denied a preparatory home visit before his release on parole next week because he is considered to be a “danger to burglars”.
In a meeting last week with the wing governor at his prison and Annette Stewart, his probation officer, Martin was told that he had been refused a trial three-day home release because the authorities felt that he might reoffend even during that short space of time.
It is normal practice for prisoners awaiting release to be given a few days outside to introduce them gradually to the prospect of regaining their liberty.
It had been thought that Martin had previously not been given the home visit because of fears over the security of his property. Concerns have been raised about Martin’s safety after his life was threatened by friends of the teenager he killed.
The revelation that the probation authorities are still reluctant to let him go, even so close to his release, sparked fury from his supporters last night. Malcolm Starr, a close friend, said: “This is the final insult.”
Henry Bellingham, Martin’s MP, who visited the farmer in prison last week, will take up the snub with the Government. He said: "I will be writing to the Home Secretary about this, it is quite extraordinary.
“Tony Martin has been turned into a political prisoner. The Probation Service is being vindictive. Even the matter of a house visit, a standard request for him to be treated normally, has been spiked and I find it stunning.”
The 58-year-old farmer related the conversation with Ms Stewart in a letter to Peter Sainsbury, the general secretary of the POW Trust, a charity which has been supporting Martin.
In the correspondence, a copy of which has been supplied to this newspaper, Martin said: “There was a meeting today after Malcolm [Starr] visited with the parole board for home visit. They still consider me dangerous.”
It is understood that Ms Stewart questioned Martin about his views on the burglar he shot dead, Fred Barras. Martin replied that he was “not going down that route again”.
Mr Sainsbury has now written to the governor of Highpoint, the category C prison in Suffolk where Martin is being held, demanding an explanation in writing.
A reply to Mr Sainsbury’s letter from the governor, which was handed to Martin directly on Friday, states that the home visit was not granted because he “did not fit the criteria”.
Ms Stewart has previously written a report on Martin which was submitted to the Parole Board before its ruling in January. In it she said that Martin’s support base in the country had made him more likely to reoffend.
“This is a case which has attracted immense and ongoing media attention and public interest,” she wrote. "I believe this has had an impact on Mr Martin’s own perceptions of his behaviour and his right to inflict punishment on those whom he perceives to be a threat to his own security.
“Indeed this may have contributed to his justification of the offending. This encapsulation of his views has served to disallow any rational contemplation by Mr Martin of his crimes and he does not express any remorse for the death of one so young.”
Martin was convicted of murdering Barras, 16, and wounding his accomplice, Brendan Fearon, 33, during a burglary at the farmer’s home in Emneth Hungate, Norfolk, in August 1999. This was reduced on appeal to manslaughter. He became eligible for early release last autumn, at the discretion of the Parole Board, after having served half of his sentence.
Although this was turned down he is now automatically entitled to parole having completed two thirds of his prison term. Fearon, who has more than 30 criminal convictions and is currently in jail, is seeking compensation from Martin under the Human Rights Act. Last night Mr Sainsbury described the refusal of a home visit for Martin as “absolutely appalling”.
“There has been no process by the Prison Service to fit him back into the community,” he said.
"Why is he not in an open prison now for a start? Normally prisoners are transferred to open conditions prior to their release to allow them to readjust, but not Mr Martin.
"The Parole Board have gone out of their way to stop him being released. He should have been released last September, which was his earliest possible release date.
“Then an idiot probation officer said he should not get it because he was a danger to burglars and now this. It is one insult after another.”