I personally do not believe in the death penalty, but I don’t have a clear answer when it comes to drug-related crimes… Living in British Columbia, I have seen firsthand how fentanyl has devastated communities. In my town, which has a population of barely 100,000, there were already 100 overdose deaths last year alone.
Recently, four Canadians were executed in China for drug offenses, raising the ongoing debate about how different countries handle drug-related crimes. While some argue that harsh penalties serve as a deterrent, others believe that addressing the root causes of addiction and trafficking is a more effective approach.
What do you think?
That’s what makes this case even more baffling. This person had already served two years in jail for drug-related crimes in British Columbia—clearly, they weren’t successful at it. So why risk everything by trying again, especially in China, where the penalties are severe and well known?
It raises questions about desperation, lack of rehabilitation, or maybe just arrogance in underestimating the consequences. In B.C., drug offenses often result in relatively light sentences, but in places like China, the stakes are entirely different. Did they think they could outsmart the system? Or were they trapped in a cycle they couldn’t escape?
Whatever the reason, it’s a grim reminder that different countries handle drug crimes very differently—and sometimes, the consequences are irreversible.
A few years ago, on my own street, I saw a dead body lying right on the pavement—a victim of an overdose. My neighbor pointed toward a nearby house and muttered, “That goddamn crack house over there…”
" if this were the Philippines, where I had just vacationed, the local police would have stormed in with assault rifles and gunned down every last drug user and dealer. The whole neighborhood would probably throw a karaoke party afterward."
I laughed and told him, “That’s a very based boomer thing to say.”