'fangyan,' 'dialect,' and 'Chinese': an examination of terms

[cranky_laowai]

Another back issue of Sino-Platonic Papers has been released in full on the Web: What Is a Chinese “Dialect/Topolect”? Reflections on Some Key Sino-English Linguistic Terms, by Professor Victor H. Mair of the University of Pennsylvania’s Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations.

Here is the abstract:

Words like fangyan, putonghua, Hanyu, Guoyu, and Zhongwen have been the source of considerable perplexity and dissension among students of Chinese language(s) in recent years. The controversies they engender are compounded enormously when attempts are made to render these terms into English and other Western languages. Unfortunate arguments have erupted, for example, over whether Taiwanese is a Chinese language or a Chinese dialect. In an attempt to bring some degree of clarity and harmony to the demonstrably international fields of Sino-Tibetan and Chinese linguistics, this article examines these and related terms from both historical and semantic perspectives. By being careful to understand precisely what these words have meant to whom and during which period of time, needlessly explosive situations may be defused and, an added benefit, perhaps the beginnings of a new classification scheme for Chinese language(s) may be achieved. As an initial step in the right direction, the author proposes the adoption of “topolect” as an exact, neutral translation of fangyan.

The entire text is now online for free as a 2.2 MB PDF:

This is Sino-Platonic Papers issue no. 29, which was first published in 1991.

[Dragonbones]

Thanks cranky – it’s always great to get these announcements from you!

[cranky_laowai]

Now available in quick-loading HTML: What Is a Chinese “Dialect/Topolect”? Reflections on Some Key Sino-English Linguistic Terms.