⚽ Football | Non-American Football: The random-ass, boring-ass game

You can’t evaluate a player based on goals because they happen so infrequently. The strongest player metric they’ve found that correlates with scoring in soccer and a player has control over is xG (expected goals). It’s an equation to shots taken by a player considering distance from goal, his angle, whether the goalie is out of position, etc. I can’t find an actual formula anywhere online, so apparently it’s proprietary. A team’s xG and actual goals have a correlation of 52%.

If you take a traditional metric in baseball such as a team’s batting average, it has an 80% correlation with scoring. Since the Moneyball revolution they have measures such as OPS, wOBA, EQA that are upwards of 95%.

The only time you can actually measure something in soccer are corner kicks and penalty kicks, because you actually know when something starts and something stops. In American football, you do that the entire game.

Furthermore, there was study by an astrophysicist that showed that in soccer, you need to win by 3-4 goals in order to be 90% sure who the better team is. How frequently does that happen?

I don’t know how non-Americans bear watching twenty-two people do something so pointless for 90 minutes.

1 Like

The title Non-American football immediately had me thinking of AFL but no, also non-Australian football :sweat_smile:

1 Like

Check out baseball. It’ll blow your mind.

2 Likes

none of the conditions I mentioned (randomness, lack of scoring, pointlessness of events) hold in baseball

I like to think of football as referring to a game that primarily involves using the foot to control a spherical object. I hadn’t realised they had a game like that in America too!

3 Likes

That’s a misunderstanding of the word’s etymology. Football refers to sports played on foot to distinguish them from more elitist sports played on a horse.

And yet it’s the most played team sport in the world. Unlike whatever sports the seppos play which seem to only be played in seppoland.

4 Likes

Oh right, I had misunderstood your meaning for ‘football’ then.

Bit of a broad generalisation to claim that all non equestrian sports are ‘random-ass’ and ‘boring-ass’?

3 Likes

The only other types I can think of I can think of are soccer and rugby. You have
more offshoots like Australian rules mentioned above, which looks like a combination of rugby and basketball.

association football
American football
rugby football
Australian rules football

Gaelic football, rugby union, rugby league, futsal…

2 Likes

According to your definition of football, you are forgetting table tennis and fencing which - last time I checked - are not played on a horse.

Although I have to say I am tending to agree with you, as the idea of horseback table tennis does seem quite amusing, making the regular ‘football’ table tennis seem boring-ass in comparison.

2 Likes

Yeah but no one calls them football (Football (word) - Wikipedia)

Are those leagues, or are those actually sports?

Oh right so you are the only one who understands ‘football’ to refer to non equestrian sports then.

Since we were talking about etymology, that was what the word was used for when it was originally coined. Not what it means now.

Separate sports - common threads run through them but noticeably distinct rules.

2 Likes

Still better than baseball.
But I wish they would get some cheerleaders too. At least in half time break I would like to see some dancing.

Is no for gringos

1 Like

Damn, this is weird as f. Too much moonshine I guess.

Anyways, going back to caring very little about all of those, especially American sports.

2 Likes

Yeah, but the NFL has like 4 billion Swifties as fans. Yuge marketing potential. Well, until the two’s relationship contract expires