Free & Anonymous HIV rapid test for Gay male

Life LGBTQ+ Forum
61
1 Like
62

There’s a minute chance of many things.

63

I’m still not understanding what per exposure means. What if someone lasts 2 pumps? Is that persons risk lower. Asking for a friend.

1 Like
64

I think it just mean per ‘sexual session’. You know, like when you do it together, then bust a nut. That’s one session.

65

Indeed. Just as heterosexual males should not waste resources getting checked for fears after vaginal intercourse.

66

But I would assume the more insertion and the longer it’s in there. The more risk?

67

Sperm is the main vector no? The amount of time seems irrelevant there. But if abrasion should lead to blood transfer it would be relevant. I’d guess that’s statistically less likely though.

68

You mean semen

69

I think for the women. I thought it’s possible abrasions where there’s blood and vaginal fluids for the guy with a HIV infected lady. So wouldn’t the longer it’s in there and more insertions mean more risk for a guy?

70

It doesn’t seem like it would make sense based on the stats. Saliva swapping isn’t even listed, maybe my fears are exaggerated but I wouldn’t want to go swapping it wantonly if it was me.

71

That seems logical.

72

I’m not sure which is stupider, the idea that there’s a special type of HIV testing for “gay” people, as opposed to straight people, or that “gay” is capitalized in the title.

1 Like
73

I don’t think that’s the definition, at least based on my understanding. ‘Exposure’ appears to be sexual encounter or sexual event, not how many pumping or how deep and long you inserted it. That’s probably a different study and a much more complicated one.

74

But i’m just saying the primary way a man gets it from a HIV positive women is from abrasions where blood is transferred or from her vaginal fluids correct? So the more insertions would likely more chances of abrasions where blood is passed between the two and the longer it’s inside, the more vaginal fluids would be in contact with the man. So wouldn’t these two factors play a role in the risk per exposure?

75

I am not sure if HIV testing in Taiwan is the same as that of in UK and US, but the idea of why there is a separate testing facility for gays are:

  1. They do counselling first. They talk to you on your sexual encounters, etc. People who work there are trained specifically to talk with gay people and most of the time they are gay themselves.

  2. Facilities like this are supported by NGOs. And these NGOs are gay NGO. Obviously, they want resources to be supporting gays and not the general male population.

76

I personally don’t think so.

Once you get in there, you already get exposed to the vaginal fluids, I don’t think you will get ‘more risk’ of it. It’s like uhm, you went for a shower. You turn on the shower. You got wet. You stopped the shower. Then turn on again. How wet can you be? Hence, I count that as one exposure.

77

But continually letting it get in contact with infected fluids surely increases the risk?

1 Like
78

I don’t think so. You already get exposed to the risk. I don’t think doing more pumping in and out will further increase the risk. However, I think you will increase the risk, when you go back to her (or another girl) the next day for another round - which I think is a new exposure. (Actually the risk/exposure to the same person I believe is less)

79

Increased friction*time, increased chance of abrasions, increased chance of blood transfer, increased risk.

4 Likes
80

“Doctor, I’m afraid that I may have picked up some phobias!” :astonished:

1 Like