Itâs almost like state-sponsored suppression of reliable energy sources and state-sponsored incentives for unreliable ones creates less reliable energy.
I think you might have missed the point of the picture 
No, I got it. I was pointing out why it didnât make sense. Believing in lower regulation does not equate with believing in no regulation. And believing in some regulation does not equate with believing in stupid regulation.
Coca-Cola: âBe less white.â
Polar bears:
Whoa, Tom Tomorrow is still around? I remember reading those strips during the Bush Jr administration, but just assumed they had stopped for some reason.
Yep, still around and always spot on.
Guess I have some back reading to do.
If youâre wearing a BLM t-shirt and describing the US as a âcapitalist hellscapeâ, Iâm gonna guess that youâre not being called a commie for suggesting that poor people donât deserve to starve.
Cages:
Migrant facilities:
Nowhere in the English language mandates that extreme dissatisfaction with a particular form of something should exclude all other related forms.
You can still like Capitalism while being dissatisfied with one form of it. Itâs not mutually exclusive.
if you havenât called someone a racist today, youâre probably not far left