Funny Political Pictures

image

4 Likes

There’s no way Clinton fits into a size 5.

Glad to know you’ve studied her body so much. That might explain why we’re still talking about her in 2020.

He probably just remembers her from the ā€œside of beefā€ video.

The fact that her body can stand without support is amazing. But yeah, it was a cheap shot. I get one in once in a while, so may as well give it to the most odious politician of them all.

image

3 Likes

Outside of the fact that Soros was rich and a Jew and influential, what is the exact gripe with him anyways? He’s been elevated to near mythic status for conservatives. Is it just dog-whistley fun or has he done anything besides be a member of the tribe and successful in politics and business?

edit: is, not was. Thanks @Dr_Milker

Was? Do you know something we don’t?

You got me…is…

same question tho, what’s the knock on him? I mean, this is unintentionally funny so I thought I’d put it up

Out of one side of their mouth they complain about one man George Soros and on the other they complete ignore an entire network of billionaires pumping money into GOP super PACs - the KOCH Network. If you haven’t read Dark Money you should. The amount of money from billionaires to the GOP dwarfs what the DNC gets in turn. In the 2016 election, the KOCH Network had an approx. $880M invested in super PACs vs. something like $25M from Soros for the DNC. The GOP makes up 83% of dark money funneled through super PACs in politics.

There really is no comparison between the GOP and the DNC in terms of politicians beholden to financial interests.

So let’s unpack the Soros hate, he’s wealthy and Jewish and a financier ergo there is some kind of conspiracy? Is he one of those (((disloyal))) Jews the kids tweet about?

Those who invented the stuff about him know. Most are just regurgitating what they are told to and probably couldn’t answer a question about it. Like asking for the definition of socialism, or communism.

20200602_191648

Can we compare their successes then?

Absolutely. But I don’t think you want to get into democratic presidents vs. Republicans on the economy.

ā€œThe superiority of economic performance under Democrats rather than Republicans is nearly ubiquitous; it holds almost regardless of how you define success"

No no no. Read your quote.:

Compare the money and what elected politicians were expected to do and how successful they were at achieving it. Any POTUS outside of FDR can’t make much of a claim to ā€œthe economy.ā€ I think our level of discourse has risen above that notion. :+1: