Grammar question: Use of "the" with comparatives

Hi,

I’ve researched this in several grammar reference books, but it is still unclear to me.

The general rule is to omit “the” before comparative adjectives/adverbs. OK so far.

“The model will be smaller”
“We could get it done quicker”

Apparently there are exceptions, but I have only examples and no logic or reasoning to back up the examples:

“She is the younger of the two sisters”
“Of the two wrestlers, John is the stronger”

An example TOEIC question:

[i]“Between them, Dr. Gates has ______ insight.”

A. the greater
B. greater
C. greatest
D more greater[/i]

Well, answers C and D are clearly wrong. Difference between A and B less clear. On impulse, I’d pick B. The book says A. I’ve found references to back up the book’s answer, but none of them explain it.

Questions:

  1. What is the grammatical logic behind using “the” in those last examples?

  2. How is that different from the more general use, such as “he is bigger” (no “the”)?

“The younger” is a noun, short for “The younger one”.

“Between them, Dr. Gates has the greater insight.” Again, ‘insight’ is the noun.

“The model will be smaller” <- adjective
“We could get it done quicker” <- adverb
“he is bigger” <- adjective
“She is the younger of the two sisters” <- noun
“Of the two wrestlers, John is the stronger” <- noun

last two are the same construct in a different order, “specific noun of plural noun”

[quote=“Big Fluffy Matthew”]“The younger” is a noun, short for “The younger one”.

“Between them, Dr. Gates has the greater insight.” Again, ‘insight’ is a noun.

“The model will be smaller” <- adjective
“We could get it done quicker” <- adverb[/quote]
I see where you’re going, but “the younger” isn’t a noun. It is a definite article + an adjective. The noun “one” is implied, but omitted.

The existence of the nouns was clear, even the omitted noun “one”. I had gotten that far late last night and gave up.

So, if I understand you correctly, BFM, you are saying that, like with all grammar, it is the noun that is mandating the definite article “the”, not the comparative adjective. Is that right?

“younger (one)” bloody well is a noun, look at the construct in other languages, the “one” (even if it is implied and omitted) makes it a noun.

But I’m no English teacher, I don’t even play one on TV, so it’s very possible I’m talking bollocks.

I think it may be a case of when you have two people/objects to choose from, and it’s kind of a mix between the superlative and the comparative, you can use “the” with the comparative. What I’ve trying to say is that in the case of only having two things to compare, the comparitive and the superlative are one in the same and it is common to use the comparative, but with “the”, which implies that it is in fact the superlative (of the two).

That probably makes about as much sense as Brad Pitt in Snatch. I hope you can understand where I’m going.

[quote=“irishstu”]I think it may be a case of when you have two people/objects to choose from, and it’s kind of a mix between the superlative and the comparitive, you can use “the” with the comparitive. What I’ve trying to say is that in the case of only having two things to compare, the comparitive and the superlative are one in the same and it is common to use the comparitive, but with “the”, which implies that it is in fact the superlative (of the two).

That probably makes about as much sense as Brad Pitt in Snatch. I hope you can understand where I’m going.[/quote]

FOOKmelookathasoizuvum, howbigizeedyareckon?
Eezabeegmunatsfusherr!

Maybe you should ask an expert like Ali G :laughing:

YingFan

[quote=“Big Fluffy Matthew”]“younger (one)” bloody well is a noun, look at the construct in other languages, the “one” (even if it is implied and omitted) makes it a noun.

But I’m no English teacher, I don’t even play one on TV, so it’s very possible I’m talking bollocks.[/quote]
BFM, think you’d better blow the dust off ye ole grammar book :wink: Section: Parts of Speech.

[quote=“irishstu”]I think it may be a case of when you have two people/objects to choose from, and it’s kind of a mix between the superlative and the comparitive, you can use “the” with the comparitive. What I’ve trying to say is that in the case of only having two things to compare, the comparitive and the superlative are one in the same and it is common to use the comparitive, but with “the”, which implies that it is in fact the superlative (of the two).

That probably makes about as much sense as Brad Pitt in Snatch. I hope you can understand where I’m going.[/quote]
Brad, I think you’re on to something. And if not, you have a cute accent!

Found a reference on the internet:
www.providencehs.net/sophia/lessons/1223/122334.pdf

Though not definitive, check out bottom of Page 15.

I think it is related to use of the superlative concept with only two items. Reading another source now. More later.

Somewhere in TOEFL it was explained as “the youngest of three” but “the younger of two”.

[quote=“seeker4”]“She is the younger of the two sisters”
“Of the two wrestlers, John is the stronger”

  1. What is the grammatical logic behind using “the” in those last examples?

  2. How is that different from the more general use, such as “he is bigger” (no “the”)?[/quote]It’s as Irishstu said. It’s a case of using a comparative form with a superlative sense.

According to prescriptive grammar, this is the correct way to express a superlative sense when there are only two persons or objects, as Tyio Ma said. The “…est” superlative is used for three or more.

From a viewpoint of descriptive grammar, however, it’s not so clearcut. According to Celce-Murcia and Larsen-Freeman in their excellent work “The Grammar Book”:
“…this is an oversimplification of the difference between comparatives and superlatives. Whether a speaker chooses to use a comparative or superlative to a large extent depends upon the speaker’s perspective, not upon the number of things/people being compared.”

On the topic of “the”. Chinese don’t have it. If you removed it totally from English where would we be losing out? I wander how it originated?

I’m setting up a society for elimination of “the” from English language.

[quote=“seeker4”]An example TOEIC question:

[i]“Between them, Dr. Gates has ______ insight.”

A. the greater
B. greater[/i][/quote]

Coming back to the specific example, my initial feeling is that both are equally correct. The use of “the” would be optional. Most likely the test writer made a mistake. S/he wanted to test the comparative form and the correct answer would be “greater”, and then chose what s/he thought would be the best set of wrong answers for the test. The superlative “greatest/the greatest” and a fusion of comparative and superlative: the + greater “the greater”. This last choice was unfortunate because in this kind of structure you are dealing with a comparative used in a superlative sense (see Irishstu), and voila!, this thread is born.

But if we move the prepositional phrase to the end of the sentence we can actually see a difference.

A. Dr. Gates has greater insight between them.
B. Dr. Gates has the greater insight between them.

A seems to be saying that in the physical location between two objects, Dr. Gates’ insight is increased.
B says what is intended: of the two people, Dr. Gates has more insight.

So, according to the movement test, the correct answer should really be “B. the greater” but I’ll give you 10 to 1 odds that the TOEIC exam will have that be the wrong answer. I’d pick “A” on the test.

The use of of/between and a comparison asks you to find the case that trancends the members of the group i.e., the superlative so you use “the” because it is the superlative case.

While I believe this is correct, it is a statement of how vs. why. How is useful, but I’m mostly trying to figure out why.

[quote=“joesax”][quote=“seeker4”]“She is the younger of the two sisters”
“Of the two wrestlers, John is the stronger”

  1. What is the grammatical logic behind using “the” in those last examples?

  2. How is that different from the more general use, such as “he is bigger” (no “the”)?
    [/quote]
    It’s as Irishstu said. It’s a case of using a comparative form with a superlative sense.
    [/quote]
    This might be a bit like asking the question about “one hand clapping,” but … within the context of this conversation, when is a comparative form used without a superlative sense? If you have three people, with superlative, you are saying one is the most. But with two people and comparative, effectively, you’re saying exactly the same thing. That would seem to dictate the use of “the” in all cases of using comparatives, but it doesn’t. In other words, we always seem to be describing the superlative sense with comparatives, even if we don’t say that or immediately think of it that way. In the simplest example, “John is bigger than Bill,” John is both larger in size and the largest (between the two of them), but we don’t use “the”. ??

[quote=“joesax”]
According to prescriptive grammar, this is the correct way to express a superlative sense when there are only two persons or objects, as Tyio Ma said. The “…est” superlative is used for three or more.

From a viewpoint of descriptive grammar, however, it’s not so clearcut. According to Celce-Murcia and Larsen-Freeman in their excellent work “The Grammar Book”:
“…this is an oversimplification of the difference between comparatives and superlatives. Whether a speaker chooses to use a comparative or superlative to a large extent depends upon the speaker’s perspective, not upon the number of things/people being compared.”[/quote]
Very interesting point about prescriptive vs. descriptive here, although I think it addresses a related, but different issue. That issue is whether to use the true superlative form (-est) in a traditionally comparative role (between two people).

[quote=“puiwaihin”][quote=“seeker4”]An example TOEIC question:

[i]“Between them, Dr. Gates has ______ insight.”

A. the greater
B. greater[/i][/quote]

Coming back to the specific example, my initial feeling is that both are equally correct. The use of “the” would be optional. Most likely the test writer made a mistake. S/he wanted to test the comparative form and the correct answer would be “greater”, and then chose what s/he thought would be the best set of wrong answers for the test. The superlative “greatest/the greatest” and a fusion of comparative and superlative: the + greater “the greater”. This last choice was unfortunate because in this kind of structure you are dealing with a comparative used in a superlative sense (see Irishstu), and voila!, this thread is born.

But if we move the prepositional phrase to the end of the sentence we can actually see a difference.

A. Dr. Gates has greater insight between them.
B. Dr. Gates has the greater insight between them.

A seems to be saying that in the physical location between two objects, Dr. Gates’ insight is increased.
B says what is intended: of the two people, Dr. Gates has more insight.

So, according to the movement test, the correct answer should really be “B. the greater” but I’ll give you 10 to 1 odds that the TOEIC exam will have that be the wrong answer. I’d pick “A” on the test.[/quote]
Well, a couple of thoughts on this. We already have a few reference books that back up the TOEIC book’s answer (“the greater”). You had me going on the “movement test” idea, I was saying, “yeah, yeah, yeah” and then “no”. I was with you right until the end when you said “so the answer should be B”. I don’t see how your movement test arrives at that destination. In fact, I think you demonstrated how it arrived at the other destination. No?

You seem to just be saying that we must use “the” when expressing the superlative sense with comparatives. If so, there’s been lots of agreement on that, but still not much explanation.

[quote=“Ironman”]On the topic of “the”. Chinese don’t have it. If you removed it totally from English where would we be losing out? I wander how it originated?

I’m setting up a society for elimination of “the” from English language.[/quote]
Probably the most sane approach, except I’m hesitant to mix the words “Chinese language” and “sane” in the same sentence. Otherwise, great proposal. Sign me up.

OK, in all seriousness, “let me sum up”:

As I see it, we have quite a few statements that a specific usage is correct without explaining why it is correct. While not going where I wanted to go, it does help to explain why most grammar reference books do the same. And it makes the “how” clearer.

As for “why,” it seems the list of comments/concepts that might qualify as candidates for actual explanations, although needing further development, are as follows:

  1. “It’s not the adjective, silly, it’s the noun” by Big Fluffy Matthew.

  2. “Use of ‘the’ changes the meaning of the sentence” by puiwaihin.

Did I miss any other possible explanations?

At some point in a hunt for “why,” we often have to fall back on convention – it’s just the way we do it. That might be the case here as well, but I’m not satisfied that we’re at that point yet. It seems like we should be able to discern a reason that I can pass on to students and non-native teachers who are asking this question.

Oh yeah, and thanks for all the good comments so far!

Okay, thats one possible for and one against. I talked with Omni about this on a hike and he nearly had a stroke.

He takes correct English very seriously.

I’ve got a bug about it because I write manuals at times and all stupid ‘the’ words make it awkward but they look wrong if you leave them out.

[quote]
Hold the left foot while the right foot is inserted in the ducks beak then the left hand is used on the table lamp while the…[/quote]

That sort of thing.

Going back and reading what BFM wrote, I think he is right. You can test it by making the superlative the subject of a sentence. It seems to work OK.

The younger of the two is taller, meaner, and faster.

[quote=“Fox”]Going back and reading what BFM wrote, I think he is right. You can test it by making the superlative the subject of a sentence. It seems to work OK.

The younger of the two is taller, meaner, and faster.[/quote]
Excellent demonstration of my question:

Why do we say it as Fox has suggested instead of saying …

“The younger of the two is the taller, the meaner, and the faster.” ?

I know my example is not standard English, at least by common usage, but I can’t explain why the first comparative (younger) gets a definite article and the others get none at all.

I think my comments on this thread have just gained some merit and almost jumped onto topic.

It is because THE is a useless word and in this case it screams useless at us when we keep repeating it as would be required in the sentence you just mentioned.

I think my comments on this thread have just gained some merit and almost jumped onto topic.

It is because THE is a useless word and in this case it screams useless at us when we keep repeating it as would be required in the sentence you just mentioned.[/quote]

“the” helps reduce ambiguity. In Chinese you have to rely on context to know whether a person is talking about all of a type of noun, a hypothetical instance of a noun, or a specific concrete noun with which the listener is familiar. “a noun”, “the noun”, and “nouns” encodes that information in the syntax so that there can be no ambiguity.

You need to go better than that.

“The” is always before the word it refers to so there is no ambiguity whatsoever.

Come on, please serve up a good answer and I’ll feel better using that useless word all the time.