Jeffrey Epstein, sex trafficking, and the rabbit hole gets bigger

"Unaware of my [personal history with Epstein, this person assured me that the New York financier was no serious harm to anyone. He was a good guy. A charming guy. Useful, too. He knew a lot of rich Arabs, including the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, and, further, he had clever ideas about creating bond issues for them. “OK, so he has a girl problem,” this person threw on, almost as an afterthought.

"Epstein’s name, I was told, had been raised by the Trump transition team when Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. attorney in Miami who’d [infamously cut Epstein a non-prosecution plea deal back in 2007, was being interviewed for the job of labor secretary. The plea deal put a hard stop to a separate federal investigation of alleged sex crimes with minors and trafficking.

“Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta."

This thread’s topic could now take down some people.
Bill Clinton was FAA-logged on 26 flights with him.
What about Trump’s association?
Bradley Edwards, attorney for one of Epstein’s accusers, publicly said that, in 2009, after serving subpoenas on a lot of people only Trump picked up the phone and gave the lawyer as much time as he wanted. Trump gave good information that checked out and helped the lawyer.

And then Nancy Pelosi’s dumb daughter tweets after Epstein arrest:

"Christine Pelosi, who is an official with the Democratic National Committee, tweeted on Saturday: ‘This Epstein case is horrific and the young women deserve justice.

‘It is quite likely that some of our faves are implicated but we must follow the facts and let the chips fall where they may - whether on Republicans or Democrats.’"

— articles tell all the details.
One says that since Epstein now under Southern District New York, he has to blab.
Only spoiler is Comey’s daughter at SDNY.

1 Like

A lot of smoke and mirrors on this one, what we know is Epstein got a very light sentence before, he may weasel his way out of this one, he may get a heavy sentence, everybody on all sides would applaud that.

He’s well connected, Donald Trump, Prince Andrew and Bill Clinton being some of his associates. I read they seized a number of Cd’s with women and other people, let’s just say, whoever get’s implicated, from whatever side, or whatever country, be it a Saudi Prince or a British Royal, President of the US or ex President of the US, if they were engaging in pedophilia, they should face justice the same as anyone else.

The rest is smoke and mirrors at this point, speculation and picking who you like and dont like to smear or pretend the connection is irrelevant.


I agree it’s smoke and mirrors at this point.
Funny timing for this to come back to the scene.
Both sides will run with it for sure.

1 Like

Timing is rarely “funny”. The British ambassador to the US just resigned, is it funny timing that this happens on the cusp of a new PM coming in? Sweeping the dirt under the rug and giving the new PM a clean sheet sounds more likely.

Why Epstein now? Perhaps it’s only now that those who he had dirt on are already removed from positions of power. Just speculation of course.


As I get older and see how things work out, these things rarely seem to be a coincidence.


I don’t think the super rich will EVER sacrifice one of their own. How many bankers went to jail in 2008? Zero. I don’t think E. will snitch either.

But maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan, if they have the tapes Ann Coulter says he had been using for blackmailing purposes, look out.

1 Like

You should see your doctor regularly if thoughts like this persist as you age. :idunno:

Information seems to leak during opportune timing. Or inopportune timing.

What if he supported some NY Baseball team ? :thinking: Does that make one more stable ?

Maybe a specialist?

Perhaps you can be naive to think information just comes out and used randomly.

There certainly seems to have been a lot of high powered people facilitating leniency for Epstein last time.
Establishment names keep coming up all over the place. I guess we will see.
I can’t think that if Mr. Clinton is put on a stand , many would believe him stating , " I did not have sexual relations …etc".
Strange that Clinton states only a handful of flights with Epstein , yet the flight logs ( verifiable I imagine) are supposed to log 24 -26 flights, with 5 of those without his security detail. Anyway.
I think if DJT was implicated , it would have been out long ago …save them all this bother .
Would be good to drain some of the swamp ( both sides)

So there was a pedophile conspiracy within government after all. Any of them like pizza?

I remember reading last year Mike Cernovich was behind getting this up and running.
I see non of the presstitutes have given him any credit. No surprise.


can see his response

Pizza? Jim Will Fix It

Define “handful.”

Maybe they were “handful flights” as opposed to “mouthful flights.”

That’s very Clintonesque.

So the Courts don’t sex child sex abuse as a big deal. K.

CNN is playing defense and deflection right out of the gate. It’s fun when we know they know something that they haven’t been given permission to tell us, inn’t?

It’s more likely his vast financial resources to hire the best law firms and detective agencies to dig up dirt on victims kept him out of jail .