You’re barking up the wrong tree. I never suggested the murderers actions were justified.
I suggest he’s an irresponsible person.
[quote=“Jaboney”]You’re barking up the wrong tree. I never suggested the murderers actions were justified.
I suggest he’s an irresponsible person.[/quote]
It he’s not responsible, how can he be irresponsible?
[quote=“Jaboney”]You’re barking up the wrong tree. I never suggested the murderers actions were justified.
I suggest he’s an irresponsible person.[/quote]
It he’s not responsible, how can he be irresponsible? [/quote]An irresponsible man might have a few too many brewskis and leave a secret company prototype behind in a bar. He’s not criminally responsible when someone else scoops it up and sells it illegally – but he might be well-advised to go into a new line of work.
There’s an interesting National Review piece by Nina Shea on attempts in the UN to get anti-blasphemy measures passed. The piece is not about that preacher, but I think it’s relevant to the subject of this thread.
Here are the first few lines:
The piece then gives a brief history of efforts to pass such a measure.
Here’s an interesting chunk near the end:
Here’s the piece, if you want to check it out: nationalreview.com/articles/ … hea?page=1