[quote=“Hokwongwei”]
I’m keenly interested in this too, because now I no longer reside in Taiwan yet hope to continue providing translation services to Taiwanese clients. It seems I should be able to do this – they just report the expenditures as they do when working with a foreign firm. Why would the situation be any different for someone who is simply visiting Taiwan and providing the same service?
For example, if I am a legal consultant based in the US, I can give a consultation to a Taiwanese firm with no problems; but if I am a legal consultant who is visiting Taiwan on a visitor’s visa, and during that trip I do some consulting, this is technically illegal? I don’t understand how that makes sense.[/quote]
Seemed like Brother Feiren explained this more than eloquently here:
[quote=“Feiren”]
If a foreigner is physically in Taiwan and providing services to anyone, the foreigner is working. A foreigner cannot work in Taiwan without permission from the Ministry of Labor. When you are physically in the US and providing services to a Taiwanese client, you are working in the US and you are subject to US employment law. When you are physically in Taiwan and providing services, you are subject to Taiwanese employment law. We live in a world where borders matter less than they did, but laws governing employment and the movement of people are still very firmly rooted in the old world of nation states. They are likely to stay that way for the foreseeable future.[/quote]
It ain’t about the work you do*, it’s about
A. Where you get paid
B. Where you reside
[quote=“Hokwongwei”]So basically any business meeting that occurs in Taiwan is technically illegal???
OK, how’s this as a hypothetical: My boss and I were traveling in Taiwan (him on business, me on vacation) and he had to have a meeting that he wanted me to call into so I could take notes. I did that from a hotel in Nantou while he was in Taichung. Is that technically violating the law?
What about, let’s say, foreign body guards for visiting celebrities? Does each body guard need a work permit?[/quote]
I’m sure you are simply posing hypotheticals in extremis.
In case I’m wrong, here it is, nice and slow.
7th Grade Civics in a nutshell.
If we’re assuming that none of the people in your example are being employed locally, and are in the country legally, it wouldn’t be illegal. Like this actually has to be explained.
The OP’s talking about working for pay in Taiwan.
That is, again, going real slow here for you, providing labour/services and collecting remuneration from a local entity for doing so.
The government (here, AND in the US, AND in Dubai, etc.) has certain conditions to which it requires everyone (including, but not limited to, non-citizens) to adhere in order to engage in such activities.
There are two issues here.
First, taxation.
Any government has the right to require anyone present in the country to contribute tax revenue since, it’s assumed, every person there will have the opportunity to avail themselves of, for example, maintained roads, parks, bus benches, and jogging paths, as well as public health maintenance, police/fire/ambulance services, and (relative) protection form invading hostiles, all of which are fully or partially financed by such revenue.
Again, I stress the OP’s professed desire to do all this legally.
Naturally, there are craploads of things that can be done to avoid taxes, but that isn’t what he asked.
As for you complaining that you should be able to make a living without paying taxes, well, congratulations.
You’re a 1970s Taipei County trading company laoban.
Second, residency
This is considerably less logical, but equally unavoidable.
Every country exercises immigration quotas and standards.
Most of these are, at base, motivated by intangibles like xenophobia, chauvinism, isolationism, protectionism, and, of course, straight up racism.
Please note that Taiwan has by no means a lock on this kind of policy.
Every country in the world exercises some level of this, especially since the middle of the last century.
Check the forums for what some of the ordeals my UK-born brothers have had to endure to get their long-time wives (and mothers of their children) to join them when returning home.
As far as policies not being in step with the 21st century, well, that’s kind of bollocks too.
What that really means is “I thought I’d figured out a way to use the Internet to fuck the government out of my tax dollars but now they’re making it hard for me.”
Which is fine, as long as you’re willing to get a cash bill for calling the cops when someone hits you on the head and takes your wallet, or to give the emergency operator a valid credit card when you call because the neighbor’s house is on fire, or to pay a steep admission fee for you and your kids to visit your corner park.
I think most Revenue departments are savvy enough to know they can’t realistically regulate the ebb and flow of Internet Bucks, so they don’t really try.
They just (mostly rightly) assume that sooner or later, you’re going to need to spend it, and that’s where they can pinch your cheating ass.
*I know, the deal where they export dudes for playing music for free, but that’s more of a residency than revenue issue at its core