suiyuan: Asking what the importance of a country is is not meaningless. I would say that we can very easily assess that the U.S. and the U.K. are incredibly important nations because of the sheer volume of scientific ideas, medical breakthroughs and innovations in tehcnology that have come from them in the past two hundred years. That you found eight Nobel Laureates from the Muslim world is precisely my point. Eight out of 1.4 billion. That works out at one per 175 million people. Now calculate the ratios for Christians or Hungarians. I don’t define importance as simply existing.
No, none of that is the intellectual equivalent of discussing who would win in a fight. It’s a matter of the very real fact that if certain societies hadn’t existed at certain times (including Muslims in the Middle Ages), we’d probably still be carving spears from stone, and the average life expectancy would still be a third of what it is today.
I wasn’t making up a new definition of any word. I was mocking the attitude that to call people, either individually or collectively, to take responsibility for themselves, is far too often regarded as mean, especially by many self-identifying liberals. It wasn’t anything to do with how I originally wrote it. It was to do with your deliberate obfuscation of what I wrote.
Who is ignoring the issue? The fact that a German banker gets pressured into resigning for pointing out some truths about German society.
Yes, the German government needs to look at itself. I think we’re both in agreement on that. Where we differ is that you don’t think that people need to take responsibility for themselves or their communities, and go on to explain how this entire issue has nothing to do with the immigrants themselves. Just because the Taiwanese police are lax in dealing with people who run red lights doesn’t mean that it’s the government’s fault if I run a red light and hit somebody. The buck ultimately stops with me.
I don’t believe for a second that you don’t discriminate. I just think you’re not honest about it. Are you telling me that if you needed a babysitter for your little kids you wouldn’t prefer a fifteen year old girl to a thirty five year old man? How about if you were walking down a street in a somewhat dodgy neighbourhood (or is that too much discrimination for you, and we have to ignore crime statistics?) late at night and you saw a middle-aged guy, nicely dressed, walking with his wife and two little kids versus a dozen adolescent males swearing and smoking cigarettes? Would you feel as comfortable in either situation in the two different hypothetical scenarios? Come on, tell me you would.
It’s not that you can’t follow any of what I’ve written. I could actually argue the complete opposite to what I’ve written (yes, I can be a sophist if I need to) using a mirror image of what I’d written. You would be able to follow it then. The reason has nothing to do with how it’s written or what my points are, unless you actually do have a problem with understanding an argument you disagree with (I may disagree with most of what you write, but I can understand it). The problem is that in your world view, you really want everyone to skip merrily off into the sunset together. I can understand that world view. I can follow it. I can actually stand outside myself and imagine that others do think differently to me. I don’t agree with what you’re saying, but I’m not doing the intellectual equivalent of deliberately putting my hands over my ears and screaming, “La, la, la…I can’t hear you…la, la,la. What are you talking about, it doesn’t make sense!”
Fine, if you find my opinions unpallatable. However, I am not inarticulate, and I think you’re being highly disingenuous by claiming that.
yuli: I agree that bringing in people with German ancestry who, to all intents and purposes, were not even remotely German culturally was a big mistake. Still though, Turks in Germany could still have bucked the pressures applied to them by others. I’m sure some did, and to them, my hat is off. If some guy or his kid became a successful doctor, for instance, then that is to be not only applauded, but held up to all Germans as an example. This may sound odd, given what I have written so far, but I’m actually heavily pro-immigration so long as the motivation is betterment, not the perception of receiving entitlements.
cfimages: Despite what you might think, I actually have had contact with the Muslim world and I’ve been to four Muslim nations and was fairly unimpressed in most respects. When I said, “Leaving aside Indonesia”, I was talking about productivity. Indonesia certainly produces things (other than oil) that people use, but it’s still hardly on a par with Sweden in terms of its contributions to the world.
My points about oil are that if we take away oil, what is the entire Muslim world actually famous for? Where’s the Moroccan Nokia?
Mucha Man: Really, regarding the perception of Asians in Vancouver? Canadians I’ve spoken to seem to have regarded Asians as they seem to be regarded in most places: as good in school. The negative stereotypes usually involve things like driving ability and penis size.
Is the situation with the Hui in China because the Chinese government doesn’t have bad incentives set up though? Far be it for me to defend China, but the competitiveness of the place seems to force many people to become highly entrepreneurial. There doesn’t seem to be anywhere near the same Judeo-Christian (and by extention, socialistic) type imperative of looking after your brother and providing welfare.
cfi: Yes, but again, what is it about India that leads to those things? What is it about many Muslim nations, where they are in the majority and get to run the show as they please, both politically and culturally, that makes so many of them basket cases? Why is Pakistan not nearly as successful as India?