I’m questioning the viability of this term “neocon”, meaning
neo-conservative. A couple of decades ago, being politically
conservative meant you favored low taxes, low spending and less
government. This is a Libertarian position.
Today’s so-called neocons still do favor low taxation (especially
for the rich), but seem addicted to high-spending and a huge
government with greatly expanded powers. The various US agencies
have been consolidated into an enormous Department of Homeland
Security, the Patriot Act stripped away a number of rights such
as protections arbitrary arrest and detention without trial, and
even torture (outsourced) is being applied (and being applauded
by neocons). A recent bill means that America will soon have a
national ID card with biometrics (but it will be your driver’s
license, so you won’t notice), something the conservatives were
totally against.
A good article on this topic:
A Fascist America
How close are we?
by Justin Raimondo
antiwar.com/justin/?articleid=5070
Selected quotes:
There already exists, in the neoconized Republican Party, a
mass-based movement that fervently believes in a strong central
State and a foreign policy of perpetual war. The brownshirting of
the American conservative movement, as Paul Craig Roberts
stingingly characterized the ugly transformation of the American
Right, is so far along that the president can propose the biggest
expansion of federal power and spending since the Great Society
with nary a peep from the former enthusiasts of “smaller
government.”
While the Newt Gingrich Republicans of the early 1990s were never
really libertarians in any but a rhetorical sense - Newt himself
has always been a hopelessly statist neocon - the great
difference today is that the neocons are coming out with an
openly authoritarian program. David Frum and Richard Perle, in
their book An End to Evil, advocate establishing an Orwellian
government database and comprehensive electronic surveillance
system that not only keeps constant track of the whereabouts of
everyone in the country, but also stores a dossier, complete with
their religious and political affiliations. If anyone had brought
such a proposal to the table in the pre-9/11 era, they would have
been laughed out of town and mercilessly ridiculed for the rest
of their lives. But today, the neocon tag-team of Frum and Perle
not only gets away with it, but these strutting martinets are
lauded by the same “conservatives” who used to rail against “Big
Government.”
The label “neoconservative” has always been unsatisfactory, in
part because the neocon ideology of rampant militarism,
super-centralism, and unrestrained statism is necessarily at war
with the libertarian aspects of authentic conservatism (the sort
of conservatism that, say, Frank S. Meyer or Russell Kirk would
find recognizable). Let’s start calling things by their right
names: these aren’t neoconservatives. What we are witnessing is
the rebirth of fascism in 21st century America…
Ironically, I used to consider myself somewhat conservative. I
was (and still am) most definitely a fiscal conservative. I
supported the Gramm-Rudman Act some years ago which would have
required a balanced budget. I supported Reagan’s promised Balance
Budget Amendment (which was pure smoke and mirrors - he never
tried to get it passed). Reagan was in fact the father of Big
Government. The irony of this situation never ceases to amaze me.
cheers,
DB