[quote=“sulavaca”][quote=“noripsni”]for most scooters 92 gives more torque than 95 i suppose. I don’t know any scientific explanation for this but I’ve made my own test for 1 month period.
and hey, did i mention that 92 has better MPG than 95 too?[/quote]
Basically 92 burns a little slower than 95
A 92 octane slower burn results in power over a longer piston stroke, providing more torque, but the downfall is at very high speed the fuel cannot burn fast enough to provide enough power for the engine to run faster, thus limiting engine speed or revolution pickup rate. This fuel would then be more suitable for lower performance vehicles which require more torque over power i.e. small engine VS load. Diesel power would be the very extreme in this requirement.
A 95 Octane would basically provide a faster burn/engine speed, but a lower power/torque burn. The other advantage to 95 is that it may burn slightly cleaner than 92. 98 octane therefore is used on the Toyota Prius and other Hybrids, even though it reduces the potential power output due to the design of the vehicle which uses a lower revving engine.
It is often because fast cars use a higher octane that people often assume that the higher the octane the higher the power, but this is not the case. Diesel engines providing a larger torque potential can be geared to go fast too, but acceleration may be inhibited without the use or performance enhancing devices such as turbos.
If your bike is timed and setup to run on 92 then run it on 92. You may only suffer performance using 95, and may use more fuel. You may also cause pinking, or early detonation using 95 which may damage the engine over long periods and cause accelerated engine wear.
There is no benefit to using alternative octane fuels when the vehicle is setup to run on one specific octane. If one wishes to adjust the octane level, then you must consult the owner’s manual, or have the vehicle calibrated or adjusted to do so.[/quote]
I think we’ve answered the OP’s original question, so we’re now getting into petrol-head pedantry.
Sadly, I seem unable to resist that, but I’ll keep it short since we had a (rather acrimonious IIRC) discussion on this quite recently.
Some of what you write above may be true BUT:
(a) The octane number of a fuel is a measure of its resistance to pinking/pinging/knocking/detonation, so using a higher octane fuel (95 instead of 92) will NOT cause pinking/pinging/knocking/detonation, but the reverse.
(b) The phrase “early detonation” sounds worryingly like “pre-detonation”, a widely misused, incorrect term which confuses the two separate phenomena “pre-ignition” and “detonation”. There is nothing “early” about the detonation. In conventional spark ignition engines detonation is always bad and it should not happen at any point in the 4-stroke cycle.