Nick Fuentes Warns His Followers He Will ‘Disown’ Them If They Turn to Violence After Kirk Killing
IDK who the f8ck this guy is, but he seems to think he has control over half the dipshittery of the America.
Good luck with that, dumbass.
He’s a white separatist. He wouldn’t get on with Charlie Kirk. He does have quite a large following though.
That’s what I hear, but that’s like saying a DJ has a large following. What I want to know is is his claim to have control over his minions valid?
Most of his followers seem to come from the statistically most prone to the random shooter stereotype: young, alienated men who can’t get laid and blame the world for it, aka ‘incels’. Ripe for radicalization by extremists internet cults. Just look at these goofball kids trying hard to look badass.
What a smooth charmer. I’ll be shocked if Nick has a single female follower.
Furry porn?
that’s too far
I’m afraid to ask, but my MAGA Christian friends in the ADK have been warning me about furries for years. But just the kids who want to shit in litter boxes in school. 
The Klan married and had little pillowcase babies.
He might be saying this to cover himself legally as he wouldnt have complete control over all of them.
That and other instances that are…insightful. like his time with Destiny, for example.
This is what I feared would happen after the death of Charlie Kirk. Now this asshat Nick Fuentes is being brought to the forefront. As much as many of you on the left may have hated Charlie Kirk, losing him only made way for the real extremists to make their move in.
Long read, but interesting!
Makes the Hegseth swastika announcement seem even more suspicious. And I’d forgotten about the republican Nazi chat group.
I would say they are extremists in different ways. Kirk was at least publicly seen as (though skeptical of Netanyahu it seems, evidence starting at 28:10) the posterchild of the Judeo-Christian nationalists, and Fuentes is the unhinged leader of his alt-right “groypers” who want a type of nationalism less controlled by the insanity of Zionism. Of course one group is playing pattycake with Netanyahu and his extremist wankers, while the other fetishizes Hitler and other scum of the earth. What a range.
Both are batshit. Though I would like to believe Kirk was developing the capacity to not only see the Zionist shackles put on TP USA, without being corrupted by Fuentes’s unhinged ideology as well. Yeah I am probably not being realistic.
It’s a big basket, not an umbrella
Fuentes says many things as trolling he is actually a serious catholic. Hes not at the level of candice Owens. Hes no more extreme than Anna Kasparian. Charlie Kirk was an extremist.
He’s an admitted white nationalist, anti-semite, and misogynist, to say the least. Here’s just a sampling via ChatGPT
Examples of Offensive Things Nick Fuentes Has Said
- Holocaust Denial / Praise for Hitler
- He’s said, “Hitler was awesome … Hitler was right, and the Holocaust did not happen.” Yahoo+2Mediaite+2
- He has expressed admiration for Adolf Hitler, calling him “really … cool.” The Independent+1
- Antisemitism & “Holy War” Against Jews
- In a speech, Fuentes called for a “holy war” against Jewish people: “We will make them die … They will go down … we have God on our side.” Combat Antisemitism Movement+1
- He quoted (or referenced) a line claiming: “‘If a Gentile hits a Jew, he must be killed. But when a Jew murders a Gentile, there will be no death penalty.’” Mediaite+1
- He has accused Jews of controlling finance and media: “Do you think it might be a problem that the people that are running your banks … making the movies your children watch …?” americafirstfoundation.org
- He argues America should be a Christian society without Jewish influence: “We live in a Christian world … we need to have Christian leaders.” americafirstfoundation.org+1
- Racism / White Supremacist Views
- He’s expressed the “great replacement” theory: believing that white Christians are being replaced demographically and culturally. Southern Poverty Law Center+1
- From his congressional testimony: “We are willing, ultimately, to die for our cause … It is these young white men … If you are a white male … they will try to genocide you in your lifetime.” GovInfo
- He has defended segregation-era Jim Crow: “It was better for them … they had to drink out of a different water fountain … Big f**king deal … grow up … it’s just water.” Yahoo
- Misogyny / Violence Against Women
- He said: “A lot of women want to be raped … there’s like a lot of women that really want a guy to beat the s-t out of them … but part of it is … they have to pretend like they don’t.” Yahoo+1
- He has said publicly, “women need to shut the f** up”* in various contexts. Yahoo+1
- White Christian Nationalism
- Fuentes has claimed that America was founded by white Christians, not by Jews: “America … was founded by white Christians … not Judeo-Christians … If we want to restore America … we’ve got to make America a Christian nation again.” Southern Poverty Law Center
- He rejects the label “white supremacist,” but embraces “white identity”: he said he’s conscious of his “white identity” and nationalism. Southern Poverty Law Center
- Violent and Extremist Rhetoric
- At one point, he reportedly called for total “Aryan victory” and revenge against his perceived enemies. Mediaite
- In his congressional testimony, he threatened that “your days in power are numbered … We will replace you!” speaking about those he considers political enemies. GovInfo
Kirk may have said objectionable things, maybe could be in this discussion, Kasparian probably has in some respects, but I don’t see how they are on Fuentes’ level.
1 Like
Ok I read that , although two points to consider.
-
He said many of these things when he was very young like 18 to 21 years old. He is still young probably about 28.
-
Kirk said something along the lines that he would not feel safe to take a plane with a black pilot. Nick Fuentes is not attacking the intelligence of other races.
And he says a lot that’s tongue in cheek which AI cannot distinguish. Kirk was anti transgender and said some very controversial things about black people. Fuentes has a point about replacement but I feel that would only apply to Europe as Europeans are not indigenous to the USA but to Europe.