Mark ‘ps2 fanboy’ smith wrote
I will grant you that ps2 graphics are not as good quality as xbox but then most TVs can’t display the high resolution compare to a computer. The Tv only has something like 320 lines while computer resolution like vga is 640x480. Xbox uses pc technology to get better resolution but it’s pointless unless you happen to have the lcd screens to really use it. If I wanted another windows box, I would get another pc. I believe there are xbox emulators out there for the pc.
Do you even know what you are talking about? You started off on the right track - yes, the xbox has far superior graphics to the ps2. Its no secret that the ps2 is flawed technology and falls far short of Sonys hype that it can display ‘toy story’ graphics. It is plagued by ‘jaggies’ a jargon term which describes the blocky edges of the polygons that you see on screen.
Xbox uses PC technology? I dont think so. It uses an nvidia chipset which you can buy for PC and it also has a harddrive and modified motherboard but that is where the similarities end. Put any xbox game alongside a ps2 game and the difference is remarkable in clarity, colour depth and framerate. This is through a normal 34 cm television, not a high def tv which you say is necessary.
There are no xbox emulators available for PC. Uneducated people believe that the xbox is a pc in a box, but it runs proprietary software and uses hardware that is far removed from anything found in a pc. Do some research before you post ill-informed information to people tha may not know better.
Mark:
As for games, any games developed in any system will be available for the other platforms unless the developer was bought by m$. Plus with a lot more games out there, I don’t feel I missed anything.
Is that why capcom only released Tekki for xbox? How about sega GT 2002? There are over a hundred A grade games available only on xbox, and they were produced by multi-platform companies. In addition it is no surprise to learn that the xbox version is easily better than both the ps2 and Gamecube version in multi release titles such as tony hawk 4 etc…
Believe me, if you limit yourself to one console, you are already missing out on some top class games, and this is going to continue into the future…
Mark:
M$ online strategy sucks. First of all they are not even selling their online package well. I still see them stocked up in stores in the US during the hoilday season. You couldn’t even find a network adapter for the ps2 on the shelves. Two, their scheme sucks and create a bottleneck. M$ wants to make sure that they control everything so you need to log into their servers first in order to log on to the developer’s server. This creates a bottleneck at m$ login server. Third, PS2 you only need to pay for the adapter which cost about $40. You can also buy Linksys nic which is compatable with PS2. For M$, you have to pay $50 each year for a subscription. Fourth, the voice chat from M$ sucks compared to PS2.
More blatant anti-xbox propaganda. The xboxlive experience so far has been a commercial success way beyond anything that MS expected. They were sold out within a week and doubled production to keep up to demand. Your ridiculous MS hating knows no bounds. MS have already got a working online gaming system working in the USA and now japan, europe is soon to follow. By all acounts it is lag free, easy to use and adds a whole new dimension to games. The sony effort on the other hand lacks focus, costs a whole lot more and most games only give you the option to upload your high scores toa server- big deal! I would rather play against human opponents and be able to hear them trash talk me in real time! Thats what online gaming is about
How can you say the voice chat sucks compared to ps2? ps2 doesnt even have voice chat yet! Also MS will not be charging $50 a year, thats the initial cost which included the headset, a couple of games and other goodies. The yearly fee covers ALL games that use xbolive, you can play as long as you want. the sony model will have each game charging a seperate fee - yeah…that sounds much better
Mark:
One thing also sucks about the xbox is that you need to pay for the DVD controller in order to use the DVD function. You can do that on the PS2 without the remote. The DVD remote from Sony is a lot more functional than the remote from m$.
clutching.at.straws.
Any sane gamer will mod their console of choice. Thanks to the xbox harddrive (which is an additional cost for the ps2 and isnt even available outside japan). you can save programs to your xbox such as DVDx which allows you to play any region dvd in your xbox. You dont need a dvd remote pack to use this program.
In addition you can load emulators,and have access to thousands of arcade games, other console games and more. You can also play mpgs, vcds, mp3s and even watch slideshows. I would like to see you do that on your precious ps2!
Mark:
Since the xbox does not have digital audio outputs as standard, you have to buy another accessory to use it. Optical audio output is standard on PS2.
You neglected to mention that PS2 only uses the optical output for dvd playback. The ps2 cannot encode 5.1 audio in games. The best it can do is dolby 2.2 and thats only in cutscenes (like metal gear solid)- boring!
The accesory that you mentioned for xbox is calld the high definition AV pack, its cheap and allows you to output digital sound and also use RGB output for visuals - which is a huge improvement. That also supports progressive scan visuals. Another thing the ps2 cant do on the fly…
Mark:
Also most people don’t know that in certain games you can play between multiple PS2s via the i-link(firewire).
Umm hello, the xbox allows you to hook up 16 systems through a widely available network hub and wires which are available at any PC store. Its much cheaper and until you play HALO linkup, you havent played network console gaming. period!
Mark:
Since most people want to buy one console, the PS2 is still the number one choice. In order to fully utilize the capabilities of the xbox, you would have to spend a lot of money for a HDTV and a good stereo system. If you can pay for that, you can pay for more than one console.
Untrue. the xbox blitzes the ps2 through standard AV cables on a normal TV. If you can afford better equipment, then the difference is even more staggering. Some of us can afford more than one console, i have all 3 and the xbox is getting all the playtime lately.
Mark:
The sales record have proven that the PS2 is still the top console out there. xbox has only shipped about 10 million units while the PS2 has shipped over 40 million units. The equipement might be “old” but it still works well. Hopefully the sales will continue the way it is and the xbox will disappear, like the Phillips CDI, into the history of consoles.
_____________________________________________________–
sales does not equal quality
The xbox has experienced far greater sales numbers in its first year than the ps2 did. And thats against 2 other rivals. What did the ps2 compete with? the sadly failing sega dreamcast (which is better than ps2 in a lot of areas)
Mark, Its fools like you that support the ps2 and neglect to try anything new. Dont feed other people your lies, especially guys that ask for honest opinions. Why should that person get lumped with a console that is on its last legs? Let him try the xbox and play some truly next gen games. If you have the cash, i suggest you do the same