I already did in my original post. Representation should be proportional to population. You can reread it if you want.
Isnāt that what the House is for?
And I think it should be for all branches of power, so I disagree with how the Senate acts as a representative body. Ya done?
So you think SCOTUS should also be representative?
To quote you:
SCOTUS doesnāt represent state populations.
Behind a paywall, but regarding % of rulings, that needs to be weighed against consequence of rulings. If 7% of the consequential rulings all went the way of Democrats and 93% were inconsequential, then you have your blue dog in red overalls.
You said ALL branches of power.
Theyāre not inconsequential. Does āCitizens Unitedā ring a bell? One of the most monumental decisions of the past 30 years and he led the 5-4 conservative wing in that. That will shape elections in the country for years to come. He also overturned the Civil Rights act, one of the biggest liberal laws ever enacted.
You guys are just sour against him because every legal mind knows the ACA challenges are dubious and have weak standing. And his refusal to overturn it is 90% of the reason most conservatives think heās a liberal, which is the shallow end of the pool when it comes to reasoning.
Not sure itās their job to consider consequences. Theyāre supposed to focus on the law.
Consequences are for voters to deal with. Everyone else is too out of touch.
If the law has bad consequences, change the law. Thatās not the Supremeās legitimate role. Itās up to legislators. But legislators are out of touch, so the voters have to force the issue.
You donāt elect SCOTUS judges. Theyāre appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Just like cabinet members. I canāt believe I really need to break this down for you.
My point was more along the lines that some decisions carry more weight than others, actually @DrewC picked up on this correctly.
But and I might save this for tomorrow, regarding John Robberts, its far from limited to the ACA.
Iām just reading what you wrote dood. Spare me the gaslighting.
YOu wrote:
What are the three branches of power? Those checks and balances?
Well, if my original criticism is how the Senate is chosenā¦ and the Senate can confirm or block SCOTUS Judgesā¦ then Iāll let you connect the dots.
Thatās some pretty good contortionism.
Iād prefer to watch you connect the dots.
SO, I think we can agree that you think the way the federal government holds the country together needs an upgrade based largely upon where people live? Will those numbers be taken from the censusā¦which also counts non citizens?
Oy veyā¦ give me strength, lord. Discussing things with you is as exhausting as explaining physics to a house cat. Iām not going to get into some tangent about census conspiracy theories now. If this keeps going weād probably end up discussing Vince Foster by the time you gave up. Besides, if you doubt census results then you probably think the House members are elected on fraudulent grounds as well.
I havenāt presented any conspiracy theories.
You want a āmore representativeā governmentā¦including apparently the SCOTUS.
The number of House members is directly related to the census.
You want, but you donāt seem to know how to get what you want or how getting what you want is problematic.
And Iām not doubting census results. Where did you get that from? If anything I suggested that using a census which includes non citizens to restructure the how the number of House members are determined is problematic.
They means the right.
They wonāt be rioting because they are satisfied.
No, you are deliberately obtuse. You donāt win on logic, but wear down the other person by nitpicking irrelevant details until the other person throws their hands up in frustration.
Iāve already explained the Senateās connection to picking SCOTUS. And yes, you did sound like you were doubting the census, so thank you for clarifying. But it sounds like you want to have a completely DIFFERENT discussion about the census, then Iām trying to have. My only point is THIS and itās been clear from the start: House members are chosen based on regional populations. Thatās how I think the Senate should be chosen as well. And if info from the census is good enough for the House, then itās good enough for the Senate.