I have no time for this.
They are, though I think they should be covered by NHI like in France.
I have no time for this.
They are, though I think they should be covered by NHI like in France.
They’re easily available, but the legal basis is very shaky. It’s still basically illegal except under certain conditions.
That is way better than it being NOT easily available, which already is the case in many southern states.
Never heard you complain about most abortions being illegal in Taiwan.
It’s pretty scary really. It turns laws into weapons the government can selectively enforce at their whim.
Gain:
That is way better than it being NOT easily available, which already is the case in many southern states.
Never heard you complain about most abortions being illegal in Taiwan.
The doctor read through all of your posts and you never once mentioned abortion in Taiwan therefore you are not entitled to that opinion. Aha!
It’s pretty scary really. It turns laws into weapons the government can selectively enforce at their whim.
Yeah, “rule by law”. I don’t disagree. It’s weirdly easy to forget that you’re constantly breaking laws in normal life, until you run into the wrong person. Still, things seem to be getting slowly better.
The doctor read through all of your posts and you never once mentioned abortion in Taiwan therefore you are not entitled to that opinion.
Who said @gain isn’t entitled to his opinions? Just noting his selective outrage. That’s my opinion.
It’s pretty scary really. It turns laws into weapons the government can selectively enforce at their whim.
That makes no sense at all.
Never heard you complain about most abortions being illegal in Taiwan.
They are not illegal. What are you on about?
They are not illegal. What are you on about?
They’re still illegal unless certain conditions are met. Those conditions aren’t met in most cases.
刑法第288條:「懷胎婦女服藥或以他法墮胎者,處六月以下有期徒刑、拘役或三千元以下罰金。懷胎婦女聽從他人墮胎者,亦同。因疾病或其他防止生命上危險之必要,而犯前二項之罪者,免除其刑。」
優生保健法第9條第1項:「懷孕婦女經診斷或證明有下列情事之一,得依其自願,施行人工流產:一、本人或其配偶患有礙優生之遺傳性、傳染性疾病或精神疾病者。二、本人或其配偶之四親等以內之血親患有礙優生之遺傳性疾病者。三、有醫學上理由,足以認定懷孕或分娩有招致生命危險或危害身體或精神健康者。四、有醫學上理由,足以認定胎兒有畸型發育之虞者。五、因被強制性交、誘姦或與依法不得結婚者相姦而受孕者。六、因懷孕或生產,將影響其心理健康或家庭生活者。」
The genetics health act takes precedence over the criminal code so no, it’s literally never illegal because every scenario is covered by the genetics health act.
every scenario is covered by the genetics health act
Under the act, abortions have to meet certain conditions. They mostly don’t. It’s just not usually enforced.
I’m waiting for a rational explanation how a “mass of tissue” magically transforms into a human being while exiting the birth canal. Going to be a while apparently . . .
Under the act, abortions have to meet certain conditions. They mostly don’t. It’s just not usually enforced.
No. All abortions can fall under the scope of section 6.
All abortions can fall under the scope of section 6.
That’s subject to a doctor’s assessment. Have you ever been to an abortion clinic? The doctor doesn’t assess shit. You pay your money and get your abortion.
Are you a lawyer? Doctors don’t assess shit because they know all abortions can fall under the scope of section 6.
I’m waiting for a rational explanation how a “mass of tissue” magically transforms into a human being while exiting the birth canal. Going to be a while apparently . . .
Because Jesus?
Doctors don’t assess shit because they know all abortions can fall under the scope of section 6.
Which requires a doctor’s assessment. Look, I’m pro-abortion. I just think the right should be put on solid legal ground.
Which requires a doctor’s assessment.
It doesn’t require a doctor’s assessment. Who told you that?