All of my students, well, all the Muslim boys, love the game. I think @superking told me once that if one guy wanted to run the field and score every time, he could, but then soccer would be like basketball. And I said, āWhat? More entertaining?ā lol
Sport is an acquired taste. If one is raised with regular scoring, such as in basketball, then thatās what one expects.
I recall a study where spectators were wired up to heart monitors when watching various sports and cricket was the most exciting. Supposedly the build up to a āscoreā is more exciting than the score itself. Chateaubriand as opposed to cheap hamburger, one assumes.
Football is loved in basically every country in Europe South America, and Africa, plus many countries in Asia, Central America, and Mexico. Thatās a lot of people loving a sport that many Americans find boring.
In Taiwan now, i see less and less young people play baseball, a lot more play and watch basketball. The school near my home has two baseball playing areas and almost never used for baseball (We play kickball, and throw the ball at the runner ha, more exciting). The basketball courts are in full use, even in the dark (city has lots of lighted ones as well few indoor ones). As far as the pro game, Basketball New Pro games are popular, the pro baseball team in KHH was a failure and no more.
In Japan I guess with younger people more like Football , a few Japanese now play in the EU and Rugby too. Baseball is top sport now, but trend is Football will pass it in the future unless they get more young people interested.
I love how he wrote this as if itās complete nonsense
managers and front office geeks rely on analytic probabilities that suggest not only that various moments will unfold exactly as others, but that these repeated events happen by the dozens.
Uh, yes, you just described statistics. He sounds like the kind of person that would refuse putting on a seat belt because not every car trip will end up in an accident.
Thereās also this:
The paucity of hitting caused by the analytical willingness to hit into shifts and to strike out in exchange for a few home runs, inspired foresight-bereft commissioner Rob Manfred to āaddā offense through using the designated hitter in both leagues
Consider: Clevelandās frequent DH, Franmil Reyes, until sent to the minors on Tuesday, was batting .213 with 104 strikeout in 263 at-bats. The teamās DH struck out 40 percent of the time!
Since most batters bat under .400, a great hitter would fail 70% of the time. Whatās the different if those failures are strike outs or fly or ground outs? Reyes isnāt sent to the minors because he strikes out of 40% of his at bats. Itās because he didnāt get on base more than 40% in his plate appearances, and didnāt hit enough long ball to be in the DH position.
What a shitty article. Sano just came off the IL, so rusty, small sample size, and obviously nobody was happy with the .083 he had to start (heās back on the IL), so lumping that in with the argument that analytics is ruining baseball is asinine. Same with Reyes - far from his numbers being acceptable due to analytics, he was hitting way below what he has in the past and was DFAd. Bobby Witt⦠heās on the Royals - 'nuf said, everyone on the Royals sucks. nothing new there (theyāve had like 3 good years in the last 30). Kyle Lewis was rookie of the year in 2020, has been trying to battle back from a couple bad knee injuries,.and is a small sample size guy just called up from the minors (where he was hitting well) - the author want them to just cut bait on him after 50 at bats?
The fact that there are 35 comments analyzing a Phil Mushnick article is the funniest part to me here. If you want to talk about sports and baseball seriously, never bring up anything that man has to say.
Not sure if youāre being facetious, but Iāll bite. And Iām not an analytics maven by any stretch, and have zero interaction with analytics in football (soccer).
Totally disagree
Analytics is all about breaking out actions into small and consistent units. No reason this canāt be done with football as well.
Right, same with basketball (I get that itās easier to digest), hockey and American football (probably most similar to football in terms of complexity and breaking down the actions of the most people away from the ball). Thank goodness advanced analytics isnāt performed in real time!
You can easily look at actions that create advantageous circumstances. Shots on goal->shots->completed passes->time of possession->winning possessionā¦and so forth. Youāre welcome.
(Iām actually much more of an American football fan)
Iāve watched some recent interviews of Billy Beane and Michael Lewis talking about what has happened since the release of the book and movie. They say that people from all over the world, who play soccer (football), cricket, rugby, basketball, and more, came to talk to them about introducing analytics into their sports, and Beane and Lewis introduced them to the actual analysts.
At this point, Iād say itās in every sport. Also, high speed cameras, and algorithms that tracks joint movements enabled wider applications of bio-mechanics that can give very accurate assessment of whatās going on and what is going wrong. To me at least, sports has never been so exciting.