[quote=“urodacus”]…their scooters suck. period. the parts may be high quality(?) but the design and the engineering in them is nowhere near as good as that in their motorbikes.[/quote]Are you kidding? The Cygnus is currently the best 125cc out there, and the BWS is the only scooter designed to go off road available for someone in the market for a new scooter. Both these scooters are really well made.
sulavaca mentioned that he owns a Movie by SYM. I just recently replaced the rear shock on one of these for a friend and let me tell you that was a headache. I had to take everything apart to reach the shock; seat, seat compartment, plastic on both sides (the plastic sides on these scooters is one piece for both sides. :s You can not take only one side off.) , air filter, anti-pollution something, rear rack, etc. I can replace the top end of the engine on a Yamaha in about half the time without having to take the bike apart nearly as much. Not to mention that it’s really difficult to remove the plastic without breaking the stupidly engineered plastic anchors. Yamaha’s cosmetic parts are almost all screwed in place as opposed to Kymcos and SYMs which uses half the amount of screws and plastic clips/anchors instead. After a few years the plastic ages, it dries, and it becomes very brittle. It’s retarded, and that’s how all the Taiwanese scooters are put together. I’ll admit that the newer models are improved, but only if you go with the top models such as the Xpro and the Fighter. The front end of these scooters is just as bad as the older models, though. Something like 2 screws and about two dozens plastic anchors and clips. It’s really poor engineering and a real pain to work with.
[quote=“sandman”]People who feel Kymco and Sym are unreliable, etc., are IMO living in the past and no longer in touch with what these companies are doing.[/quote]Well, that’s one way to look at it. How many scooters have you worked on lately? Take it from someone who works on these scooters but who is not in it for the money like Jeremy. Because that’s what it comes down to, and that has been the larger part of the arguments for SYM and Kymcos in this debate; value for the bucks.
[quote=“sandman”]That said, it was a lovely bike in terms of reliability and quality, but then, it cost nearly double what its closest Kymco would have cost new.[/quote]And why do you think that is? Sure you pay for the name, and you pay for the “import” but not THAT much.
Some people want a good value for their buck, and the local scooters offer just that. You get a scooter that will run with no or little problems for a few years at a much cheaper price. But if you add in the depreciation value, you realize that you’ve only saved money for a short term. Look on the road and see for yourself. How many old beat up local scooters vs old beat up Japanese scooters do you see? There are probably more of these ancient Yamaha Fuzzy still on the road than all of the Kymcos and SYMs of that age put together.
When is the last time any of you guys visited a scooter scrap yard here? You hardly see any imports there. It’s almost all local scooters. The amount of Japanese scooters vs local scooters is totally disproportionate to what you see on the road. There are so many local scooters that still look pretty decent, too! But they are cheap, and often times people will not bother rebuilding the engine when the time comes so they scrap them. There’s your investment in the garbage right there…
Check out this scooter:
It’s 9 years old. 90k on the clock and it has never had the bottom end redone yet. Runs like a charm. Original transmission and front suspension. Admittedly, a lot of new parts, but not a big amount if you consider that the bike has done the job for 9 years. Still cheaper than buying 2 Kymcos… A lot cheaper.
I guess now you can see why I’m so biased. I enjoyed the conversation. Now pack it up and go home. Let me win.
marboulette