Well, I wouldn’t marry a girl with small boobs. “BASIC Human rights” is such an overrated term.
Fine, but if that was so important I hope you would first find out if she was suitable physically, then marry her, not marry her then ask for a divorce stating publicly that the reason was her small bosom.
Well a padded bra would be false advertisement and a reason for a divorce.
I think we can all agree she made the mistake to “buy a cat in a bag”
[quote]
‘I want a divorce because it’s too long’
Sat, Oct 03, 2009
The Star/Asia News Network
A TAIWANESE woman reportedly asked for divorce from her husband - because his penis was too long.
Sin Chew Daily, quoting a newspaper report from Taiwan, reported that the woman, in her second attempt to divorce her husband, said she had to bear with pain whenever she had sex with him.
When the matter was brought up in the court recently, the judge called in a doctor to determine the length of the man’s penis.
However, the request was rejected as the length of a man’s intimate part was “very subjective”.
In the end, the judge rejected the woman’s petition and ordered her to return to her husband.
The woman said they were married in 1995 and she applied for a divorce 10 years later.
The application, she said, was rejected the first time. It was unclear why the petition was struck out.
On complaints by his wife that his penis was too long, the man said: “I have never measured it before.”[/quote]
His arm was too short.
[quote=“Novaspes”]That must have been the most awkard quarrel ever. I can totally see the wife shouting “You’re gonna get yourself a new dick first thing in the morning!!”
Seriously though, I think she had issues with him being impotent and sort of frigid. The whole “your penis too small” thing was probably made up/mega-hyped by the press.[/quote]
It’s sad, because that sort of problem is what tongues are meant to deal with.
I thought this was quite appropriate.
is that 5cm flaccid or 5cm full on boner?
His arm was too short.[/quote]
:roflmao: :roflmao: :roflmao:
Aaaaaand… We’re back to having hard-ons for hard-ons and needing to explain why we have such hard-ons for hard-ons…
I can see a possible solution for these two couples.
“filed for a divorce because her 55-year-old husband didn’t just have a small penis, but was also impotent”
Must have been a whole 2 inches while soft.
I guess the only person he was satisfying was himself which in that case is not a bad thing at all. :discodance:
I have no idea who these people are, but my ex-wife claiming that we broke up because I had an enormous penis is not something I’d sue her for. Unless I’d want the publicity. 
Two Coke cans? 
