The Chinese plot against capitalism

I’ve been seeing a few articles relating to this occurrence and most were of the speculative, ‘what if’, nature. This is the first one from a more substantive standpoint.
I’m not much into ‘conspiracy theories’ but this has piqued my interest. PRC, and PLA, cash reserves are legendary in their projected amount. It looks like the PRC is starting to swing their fat cat around and see who kisses its hairy a** as it goes by. This is written a bit melodramatically, but it contains some very pertinent information regarding the economic pendulum and how its swinging.

[quote]The Chinese plot against capitalism
May 29th 2007, From Economist.com

An odd coupling of communism and private equity

CHINA’S secret plan to bring down capitalism, especially in America, has become a little less secret in the past week or so. One clue came with a brave piece of whistle-blowing; a second when China started deploying its huge arsenal of capital. Congress was right to worry, after all. Those cunning commies in Beijing have studied capitalism and found its Achilles’ heel: corporate governance.

First, the whistle-blower. Lynn Turner was director of research at Glass Lewis, a firm that advises institutional shareholders how to cast their proxy votes. Last week Mr Turner said he was leaving, five months after Glass Lewis was sold to Xinhua Finance, a Chinese financial-information firm. According to the Wall Street Journal, Mr Turner, a former chief accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission, was worried about potential conflicts of interest with other Xinhua businesses, and by “another potentially troubling aspect: Xinhua once had ties to China’s Communist Party”.

If you wonder why it took Mr Turner five months to figure this out, you are questioning an American hero.

One can only worry what the Chinese will do now to sway America’s institutional shareholders—who, let’s face it, are a flock of sheep led easily astray. What heroes the bosses of corporate America were to oppose changes in corporate-governance rules that could now empower the Chinese foe: prompt action by Congress could still block competitive elections for company directors, and shareholder votes on executive pay. Even now, lists of useless directors to be imposed on corporate America are being drawn up in Beijing (though The Economist hears that the Chinese leadership is split over whether it can do more damage to capitalism by voting to pay corporate bosses less, or by sending their salary packages to ever more preposterous heights).

It is clear, too, that this proxy-voting strategy will operate in tandem with a direct assault of the commanding heights of capitalism, known to Beijing insiders as “investing in private equity”. Last week China said it would invest $3 billion in Blackstone Partners, one of the world’s leading private-equity firms. No matter that China is buying under 10% of Blackstone (which has a public offering under way) and has given up the voting rights that would ordinarily come with its shares. You can see where this is heading.

Private-equity firms are the new kings of capitalism. They buy up controlling stakes in big companies, and raise profitability by improving corporate governance. Until now, that is. What better way for China to set back capitalist industry than by buying into private equity, and thereby exerting its pernicious influence beyond the scrutiny of public stockmarkets?

This is only the beginning. A Chinese wall of money will be on its way, once the Blackstone precedent has been set. Hiding behind the bland language of “diversifying foreign-exchange reserves”, China plans to deploy abroad at least 40% of its $1.2 trillion reserves. As the Financial Times has pointed out: “to invest that you would have to buy more than 10% of the capitalisation of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.”

Congress repulsed an earlier Chinese assault in 2005, when the China National Offshore Oil Corporation tried to buy Unocal, a Californian oil firm. Let it man the barricades again to stop the Blackstone deal. It should not be deterred by suggestions that selling a stake to China is a masterstroke by Blackstone’s boss, Steve Schwarzman (pictured left), to get the politicians in Washington to defend his firm as a jewel of American capitalism at the very moment that they were preparing to denounce private equity and to regulate and tax it more heavily.

Nor should Congress be lulled into inactivity by suggestions that the Blackstone IPO, which is expected to value the firm at over $33 billion, is evidence of a bubble in private equity—and that China’s investment will prove about as canny as those disastrous purchases of American real estate and Hollywood movie studios in the early 1990s by that previous great Asian threat, the Japanese.

And don’t let’s be fooled by all the recent talk that China has embraced capitalism—to the point of allowing that American business icon, Starbucks, to set up shop in the Forbidden City. This is surely a Muhammad Ali-style rope-a-dope move to make the enemy complacent before the decisive blow is struck. This column knows a plot when it sees one. This is China we are talking about—and capitalists, especially Americans, should be afraid, very afraid.

Economist.com[/quote]

Thats what you get for allowing China into the WTO

Seems kind of alarmist. Once the money hits the open market from Blackstone, everyone has a chance to make money, not just the Chinese.

So the Chinese are becoming rich, what’s the problem?

European Companies been doing the exact same thing for ages. Is the US going to become Europe’s lap dog.

Oh, it must be that Yellow Peril thing…

[quote=“ac_dropout”]Seems kind of alarmist. Once the money hits the open market from Blackstone, everyone has a chance to make money, not just the Chinese.

So the Chinese are becoming rich, what’s the problem?

European Companies been doing the exact same thing for ages. Is the US going to become Europe’s lap dog.

Oh, it must be that Yellow Peril thing…[/quote]

I think there is much more to it than that. I think what he is implying is that when China actually dumps its massive reserves on the open market, actual cash reserves not the projected value that most Western powers operate their currency on, they will have the economic power to manipulate external currencies, i.e. purposefully crash them. When countries have far less cold hard gold reserves to actually back up their own economies, and one player has the full value in massive amounts, the balance of power swings widely in one direction.

The implication is only in terms of diplomatic leverage for negotiations. To actually act upon it, dumping US treasury notes, would also have an negative impact on the PRC. By the time the PRC economy becomes that much stronger and USA economy becomes that much weaker, so that the PRC could dump treasury notes without any significant negative consequences is at least a few decades away.

Is this any different than the scare in the 80’s when Japanese, with their famously protectionist/nationalistic economy, started buying up American companies, as well as certain iconic peices of real estate (Rochester Center, Pebble Beach, etc)?

There is the political aspect of the relationship Japanese companies don’t have to face. PRC is a 2nd world country of the Cold War, not a conquered nation forced to become allies.

So the “fear” of Japanese was limited to just economic fronts. No one in the USA would fear Japan as a military force or geo-political force counter to US interest in a poll.

PRC on the other hand would rank higher as a nation that would challenge the US on various fronts when polled.

[quote=“ac_dropout”]There is the political aspect of the relationship Japanese companies don’t have to face. PRC is a 2nd world country of the Cold War, not a conquered nation forced to become allies.

So the “fear” of Japanese was limited to just economic fronts. No one in the USA would fear Japan as a military force or geo-political force counter to US interest in a poll.

PRC on the other hand would rank higher as a nation that would challenge the US on various fronts when polled.[/quote]

Yes, the PRC. Not Asian people. You can drop that idiotic, tired “Yellow Peril” line.

Good grief! I’m with ac_dropout on this one.

HG

[quote=“ac_dropout”]Seems kind of alarmist. Once the money hits the open market from Blackstone, everyone has a chance to make money, not just the Chinese.

So the Chinese are becoming rich, what’s the problem?

European Companies been doing the exact same thing for ages. Is the US going to become Europe’s lap dog.

Oh, it must be that Yellow Peril thing…[/quote]

lol. i haven’t heard any outcry against the deal, much less in the article above. ever read the economist