The Greatest Military On Earth? Is it…
- Comptetent
- Incompetent
- Over-rated
- Well-equipped But Hamstrung By Idiotic Civilian Leaders
- Excellent - Can Do Wrong
0 voters
With the recent change in top bods surrounding Adolf Bush, we have heard eulogies from Donald Bumsfield et al regarding the U.S. miltary, namely it being “the greatest military on earth” and suchlike. But is it?
This is incomplete (and I expect that that will be quoted followed by a wisecrack) but looking back at the U.S. military’s achievements over the last 100 years, there isn’t much that they have done on their own.
WWI - Late arrivals, made contribution to victory over Germany
WWII - Again, late arrivals, made significant contribution to Allied victory over the Axis powers
Korea - Jumped in for the UN and slogged out a draw
Vietnam - Lost and left in ignominious fashion
Grenada - Ousted a few Cuban construction workers. Big deal.
Iraq I - With a lot of help from a genuine coalition, pulled back with job incomplete.
Panama - Got Noriega but U.S. troops were already there
Somalia - Dumped a few bags of rice in full media glare, got squeamish and left.
The Balkans - Few bombs from the air and er…some peacekeeping.
Afghanistan - Bombing helped the Northern Alliance oust the Taleban
Iraq II - Widely regarded as being lost. Looking for more dignified exit than Vietnam
I can’t help thinking when I hear U.S. politicos and military types go on about how marvellous the U.S. military is, that something is missing. It just seems that all this praise for the “men and women” in uniform is hyperbole and that the U.S. military, for all her exceptional equipment, really isn’t as good as the army acolytes make them out to be.
BroonAssesses

