Can you name any you do not have disdain for?
1 Like
off the top of my head, i can think of one from whom even an apology wouldnât do.
let me give you a hint
Youâve written a lot of words, but none of them answer my questions, and theyâre certainly not about CRT. I see youâre emotional, but could you please tone it down a bit. Not sure why you feel the need to respond to me in this manner. Some of your comments are quite hurtful. @TT Iâm trying to understand your position on CRT. As a fellow Canadians, I thought you would be willing to have a civil discussion. Perhaps you can get back to me when your interested in a good faith discussion. Iâm sure we can get past this. Until then, enjoy the true north strong and free
2 Likes
Iâm explaining why I donât care to answer your questions
I think weâve established that what you think you see and what actually is are two different things
You called me a liar and a troll and refused to back it up or apologize, so donât talk to me about good faith discussions, thank you.
because you wrote this.
You seem to have a lot of disdain for so called âSJWsâ but the Federal leader you support is a self described warrior for social justice
You started this series of conversations by calling @TT a troll (you may say you just questioned to clarify, but is it a meaningful difference?), because you think it is inconsistent that someone criticizing CRT voted to NPD. The poster asked why it is inconsistent, and you have not explained it yet.
The tone of @TTâs posts doesnât sound emotional for me. Your poests do sound so, sometimes.
I donât think asking someone is a troll or not is a part of effort to understand someoneâs position.
2 Likes
The court seems to feel this is more than some kind of Fox News fantasy, apparently. Hopefully this website will serve as a sufficient link to the courtâs response.
1 Like
Interesting and optimistic talk, sounds like more legal challenges coming.
Hereâs an interview with his mom, FWIW
I wonder how Crackpot Race Theory explains Louis Farrakhanâs anti-semitism. Hard to square that one with the claim that black people canât be racist. Maybe heâs just ignored as a crackpot too far.
There was a lot of fuss with the Womenâs March darling Linda Sarsour for the same reason (and her connection to Farrakhan); I seem to recall the Womenâs March movement basically dissolved because of these kinds of problems with leadership. And hence the only logical conclusion for intersectionalism.
Or maybe his work is taken within itâs proper historical context. Sort of like Dr. Seuss.
Would you give Hitler Jordan Peterson the same consideration?
edit: The proper historical context of barely 2 years ago?
2 Likes
Should we also read Mein Kampf in its âproper historical contextâ?
EDIT: TT, sorry, we must have written that at the same time 
I sometimes canât tell if McNulty is being serious or playing a caricature.
2 Likes
Yes! Do you prefer banning it? I prefer that it can be read and discussed for the POS that it is.
Also, that comp between Hitler and Farakkhan is poor.
Unnecessary.
I wonder how many Jews would agree with you
You mean like myself?
Good try at gotcha though. Mazel Tov.
1 Like
Assuming you are Jewish (how would I know?) that would make 1. And agreeing with yourself doesnât count, so still 0.
I agree. Hitler was more competent.
Farrakhan was born during a turbulent period in a turbulent country. Heâs an anachronism. There is no âhistorical contextâ other than the chip on his shoulder. Heâs exactly the same animal as the neo-Nazis in Germany: an embarrassment to modern America.