It isn’t. The owners of the copyright made a decision; the owners of Ebay made their own decision. Anybody that wants to can put the books up for sale- they just don’t have a right to demand a private company assist them.
Of course they don’t have a right. Nevertheless, eBay need to apply a bit of common sense and consistency if they want to maintain their customer base.
Back in the 60s if you claimed you loved the D, you’d be excused from being a bullet magnet. In 2021, if say you love the D, you get the corner office. Times they are a changin’.
Is your name @cake? If not, you’ve interrupted. I was talking to Cake. Not you.
(For the record, @Cake doing what you have failed to do over the course of weeks now, producing an actual academic text for discussion purposes. I would trust his academic credentials over yours at the moment.)
You posted a net article you’ve already posted, not what was asked for. I’m not asking for a net article/overview of what CRT is. I asked you for academic articles you’ve read and your comments on them. You shouldn’t have a problem producing this, it shouldn’t take you 3 times.
I guess I’ll suspend my disbelief you’ve actually read this for a minute. So now, give us the specific passages from the D’Angelo paper you take issue with, and explain why? What specific passages do you dislike about this paper you’ve obviously read with PhD level scrutiny?
Two journal articles from academic journals, all you have to do is look at them to see this. All you are doing is proving to anyone who looks at those articles that you don’t know what you are talking about.
Which has been given more than once, but you keep asking and saying I’m not delivering
I linked to an academic journal article by one of the authors of the book that you mentioned. Because it is relevant and you asked for academic articles. I’m giving you what you are literally asking for, but I think I should go back to addressing what you are metaphorically asking for…
This isn’t in my exact field of expertise (though I continue to run circles around you), and I don’t keep as current as when this stuff was required reading for me. As I said yesterday, our discussion over the past month has been a refresher.
If you can acknowledge the four points I’ve already addressed to my satisfaction, I’ll consider it