TL:DR; should I get the cheaper frame with standard rim brakes and external routing, or the more expensive frame with internal routing and compatible with disc brakes to tackle Taiwan’s hills and mountains?
I posted here a while back about my search for a new bike (the post is ‘2nd hand carbon bikes’) and was originally intent on getting a new or second-hand carbon bike to replace my aluminium-frame bike.
Then I found out about titanium bikes and got very, very, very sidetracked, and now I’m quite intent on getting one. I’d like to try some bike touring in the near future.
Finding out about titanium bike models available in Taiwan, and especially for sale in Taiwan, has been a journey down a particularly deep rabbit-hole. The aluminium frame of my current bike is made by Performer: it turns out they also make titanium frames. I went into one Taipei bike shop that sells Performer, yet they claimed Performer did not, in fact, make titanium frames. Here’s the evidence to the contrary: https://www.performer.com.tw/leap/.
That was a bit discombobulating, as was a visit to a local Hasa dealer who similarly claimed Hasa don’t make ti frames. In fact, they looked at me like I was mad. Again: https://www.hasa.com.tw/product-TI-800-Frame-TI800Frame.html.
It’s all a bit odd, as is the fact that many of the websites for these companies are filled with dead links. My guess is, since most of these are OEM businesses, the domestic market is far from a priority with the exception, perhaps, of Rikulau. Fair enough.
Anyhow, I went into my LBS to get something fixed on my current bike and realised they had a Performer Leap ti frame hanging up on the wall. I asked about it. There’s a ‘basic’ (or at least, cheaper than anything else) frame for about 38,000NTD. They suggested they could swap the components from my current bike onto that frame for no extra cost–so long as the components were compatible. This appeals, because I’m not rich. But I ride a lot more these days, and after the last couple of years, for various reasons, I deserve something shiny and new. And I have a maximum budget of 80,000, although I’d like as much as possible to come under that.
(I asked the LBS owner about Rikulau, btw, and he shook his head with a horrified expression. Bad management, he said. Terrible to deal with, compared to Performer. His opinion, not mine. I’ve been going to him for ten years, and I never had the feeling he was bullshitting me.)
To my question:
The 38,000ntd frame (Performer Leap 1.0) is compatible with standard rim brakes, same as on my current bike, which is, er, 105 shifter on one side and Tiagra shifter on the other (Frankenstein bike). No internal routing for cables, etc.
But the Performer Leap 2.1, which goes for 46,000ntd, has internal routing and is compatible with disc brakes.
I’ve been advised I’d be able to handle the hills and mountains of Taiwan and elsewhere a lot better with disc brakes than rim brakes. And sometimes, after long descents down from, say, Maokong or Guanyin, I’ve had to stop and massage my sore hands from gripping the brakes on my aluminium bike.
However, if I got the Leap 2.1, which as I say is compatible with disc brakes, I’d have to get new wheels to go with the disk brakes, and that would push the minimum cost (Leap 2.1+disc brakes+new wheels) to about 58,000ntd. Also, I’m not 100% convinced about internal routing, and the 2.1 is internal routing only. I’m not convinced, because it’s difficult to maintain and potentially expensive to get fixed.
If you had to choose, which one would you get?