Wesley Snipes facing 30 yrs prison for massive tax fraud

From Freedom To Fascism

apfn.org/apfn/reserve.htm
Secrets of the Federal Reserve

Something that all should read

It’s not tax fraud. It’s fraud to demand a tax payment that isn’t backed by law.

The latter quote in the article is the big clue [quote]an argument the courts have repeatedly rejected as frivolous.[/quote]
Exactly. Without proof of a law their only response is to use words such as frivolous, when all they should have to do is provide the law which requires Mr Snipes to pay income tax.

Its a joke to me that colonials fought a war and won based on their belief that they were paying unfair taxes and practicing unfair trading rules set by the crown, and to this day Americans are proud of their ‘freedom’ when they have nothing of the kind, and now bow to a similar system set up by their own kind. Its pure stupidity and under education to support such things.

Wesley Snipes is surely near the top of the list of biggest lunatics in Hollywood.

Check out the opinion in which the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals just confirmed his 3-year prison sentence.

ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200812402.pdf

Despite earning $37 million between 1999-2004, he failed to file tax returns for that entire period, then had the audacity to write to the IRS repeatedly, taunting them and demanding more than $10 million in refunds he claimed he was entitled to under the most bizarre, lunatic theories (including claiming that domestic income of U.S. citizens and residents is not taxable, claiming he is a “nonresident alien” even though he’s a US citizen, submitting fraudulent, fictitious documents, etc.) and vocally advising others not to pay taxes, despite the fact that his tax attorneys told him he was wrong and owed taxes and they eventually dumped him as a client because he acted so strongly contrary to their advice.

Anyway, he begged for mercy with the 11th Circuit, requesting leniency due to his family and his charitable activities, but they didn’t care. Presumably he’ll start serving his 3 years soon. What an idiot.

[quote]. . . Snipes began a long conversation with the IRS. He sent treatises describing theories about why the IRS was powerless to collect income taxes from him and several altered tax forms demanding money for taxes he had rendered in earlier years. Thus, for example, in April 2001, Snipes sent an altered form 1040X, styled as an Amended United States Individual Income Tax Return, in which he demanded a refund of over seven million dollars for taxes paid for the calendar year 1997, allegedly paid in error.”

The court noted that Snipes’s correspondence with the IRS advanced several arguments justifying his failure to file his personal tax returns, including that he was a “non-resident alien to the United States,” that earned income must come from “sources wholly outside the United States,” that “a taxpayer is defined by law as one who operates a distilled spirit plant,” and that the Internal Revenue Code’s taxing authority “is limited to the District of Columbia and insular possessions of the United States, exclusive of the 50 States of the Union.”

Snipes also claimed that as a “fiduciary of God, who is a ‘nontaxpayer,’” he was a “foreign diplomat” who was not obliged to pay taxes. However, the court noted, when Snipes consulted his long-time tax attorneys about his resistance to paying federal income taxes, they advised him that his position was contrary to the law and that he was required to file tax returns. The firm terminated Snipes as a client when Snipes refused to file his tax returns.

The court added that the actor’s resistance to the IRS did not stop at his personal filings. He integrated the ALR tax “teachings” into the accounting methodology of his film production companies, and after June 2000, his companies stopped deducting payroll and income taxes from its employees’ paychecks. Snipes also began to proselytize this theory of tax resistance. He invited several employees to an “861” educational seminar at his home. . . .[/quote]

webcpa.com/news/Appeals-Cour … 975-1.html

I liked him in Mo’ Better Blues.

he should start his time in the can now, they’ll put him with Lohan for at least 2 weeks, not the worst cellmate :wink:

Nah, he can appear on that new crime show I’m Guilty.

3 years is very steep for tax evasion.

Or when someone only wants to hold up the constitution and ask to see the law which requires the payment of income tax? I don’t believe the people fighting to find the part of the constitution which is claimed to be ratified and which supposedly then demands people to pay income tax are stupid. I would say diligent is more like it. But being locked up because one is asking for diligence on the part of the law is not fair. It seems from all I have read on the subject of U.S. income tax that there is indeed a missing part of the law when it comes to demanding income tax. Heaven knows how many tend to agree and have suffered for it. It all comes down to the argument surrounding apportionment doesn’t it? Any income tax lawyers out there?

Missing in what respect?

I’m just wondering if he got 3 years because of tax evasion or questioning the system and being famous at the same time. Did he offer to pay back the money in the end?

That’s pretty FUBAR. So, no new movies from Wesley for a few years then? Bummer. I like his action and Blade movies.

Missing in what respect?[/quote]

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_protes … _States%29
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_protester_arguments

That should cover it.

[quote=“Mother Theresa”]Wesley Snipes is surely near the top of the list of biggest lunatics in Hollywood.
[/quote]

Well thank God he didn’t play the race card. :laughing: Yea, he’s loony, just ask Halle Berry, but make sure you do it in her left ear.

He damaged the right.

Missing in what respect?[/quote]

I believe the basic arguments against paying income tax in the U.S. are:

  1. In 1913, the 16th Amendment (the “income tax” Amendment) was fraudulently and illegally declared to be ratified by a lame-duck Secretary of State just days before leaving office;

  2. There is NO LAW that requires most Americans to file a tax return, pay the federal income tax or have the tax withheld from their earnings;

  3. People who file a Form 1040 “voluntarily” waive their 5th Amendment right not to bear witness against themselves;

You can read more about the income tax ratification grievance here, on a page written by the main body which seems to reject the basis for the income tax

Yea, maybe, but those arguments are about as credible as the claim that Taiwan is actually a US territory. One would have to be nuts to refuse to pay taxes on those grounds and taunt the IRS about it and vocally advocate that others refuse to pay on those grounds. Obviously that’s sure to land you in jail for a few years, as Mr. Snipes found out. 200 million Americans pay federal taxes because they believe they are required to do so by law. A few thousand believe the arguments you posted above, not including the IRS, police, prosecutors and federal judges. If one wants to pay taxes and then file a lawsuit asking the judge for a declaration that you were not required to pay them and demanding a refund, that’s one thing, but to refuse to pay (to blatantly violate federal law) based on such whacky tinfoil hat theories. . . . well, good luck. :loco:

[quote=“sulavaca”] There is NO LAW that requires most Americans to file a tax return, pay the federal income tax or have the tax withheld from their earnings . . . .

You can read more about the income tax ratification grievance here. . . [/quote]

Feel free to read the above if you wish, but I don’t suggest believing them and acting on their advice (as Mr. Snipes did). Here’s the law they missed.

[quote=“26 United States Code, section 1”]§ 1. Tax imposed

(a) Married individuals filing joint returns and surviving spouses

There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of—
(1) every married individual (as defined in section 7703) who makes a single return jointly with his spouse under section 6013, and
(2) every surviving spouse (as defined in section 2 (a)),
a tax determined in accordance with the following table:
If taxable income is: The tax is:

Not over $36,900 15% of taxable income.
Over $36,900 but not over $89,150 $5,535, plus 28% of the excess over $36,900.
Over $89,150 but not over $140,000 $20,165, plus 31% of the excess over $89,150.
Over $140,000 but not over $250,000 $35,928.50, plus 36% of the excess over $140,000.
Over $250,000 $75,528.50, plus 39.6% of the excess over $250,000.

(b) Heads of households

There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every head of a household (as defined in section 2 (b)) a tax determined in accordance with the following table:
If taxable income is: The tax is:

Not over $29,600 15% of taxable income.
Over $29,600 but not over $76,400 $4,440, plus 28% of the excess over $29,600.
Over $76,400 but not over $127,500 $17,544, plus 31% of the excess over $76,400.
Over $127,500 but not over $250,000 $33,385, plus 36% of the excess over $127,500.
Over $250,000 $77,485, plus 39.6% of the excess over $250,000.

© Unmarried individuals (other than surviving spouses and heads of households)

There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of every individual (other than a surviving spouse as defined in section 2 (a) or the head of a household as defined in section 2 (b)) who is not a married individual (as defined in section 7703) a tax determined in accordance with the following table:
If taxable income is: The tax is:

Not over $22,100 15% of taxable income.
Over $22,100 but not over $53,500 $3,315, plus 28% of the excess over $22,100.
Over $53,500 but not over $115,000 $12,107, plus 31% of the excess over $53,500.
Over $115,000 but not over $250,000 $31,172, plus 36% of the excess over $115,000.
Over $250,000 $79,772, plus 39.6% of the excess over $250,000.

Etc.[/quote]

And . . .

[quote=“26 U.S.C section 63”]§ 63. Taxable income defined
(a) In general
Except as provided in subsection (b), for purposes of this subtitle, the term “taxable income” means gross income minus the deductions allowed by this chapter . . .[/quote]

And. . .

[quote=“26 U.S.C section 61”]§ 61. Gross income defined
(a) General definition
Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:
(1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items;
(2) Gross income derived from business;
(3) Gains derived from dealings in property;
(4) Interest;
(5) Rents;
(6) Royalties;
(7) Dividends;
Etc.[/quote]

And. . .

[quote=“26 U.S.C section 6012”]Returns with respect to income taxes under subtitle A shall be made by the following:
(1) (A) Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount. . . [/quote]

See law.cornell.edu/uscode/26/usc_sup_01_26.html

Well the fact that US the won its independance and wrote its constitution based in part on its unwillingness to continue to pay unjust taxes on which the war was based on in the first place, makes it anything but similar to the Taiwan situation. The part about being nuts to not pay taxes when you recognize you well likely be forced out of house and home by a group of armed gunmen, regardless of them acting illegally however, might be correct. I’m not sure I’m that brave either.

You break the law, you pay the consequences. You kill someone, steal things, destroy property, sell drugs, smuggle contraband, refuse to pay the taxes you owe, or drive recklessly, and you’ll get armed officers coming after you.

That’s how law enforcement works.

[quote=“Chris”]You break the law, you pay the consequences. You kill someone, steal things, destroy property, sell drugs, smuggle contraband, refuse to pay the taxes you owe, or drive recklessly, and you’ll get armed officers coming after you.

That’s how law enforcement works.[/quote]

Well, unless you work in politics and have money, then you are probably okay.