dumb too, very dumb… no good man!
What’s wrong with getting spanked in the Paris Hilton. I would not mind staying there in a suite while Durin’s Bane got spanked in the basement.
Enjoy!!!
[/url][/quote]
We don’t want to see your foot Bassman - thanks anyway 
dumb too, very dumb… no good man![/quote]
Rich, slutty, and beautiful…who needs smarts? :?
I can just imagine ah…um…“spending time” with Paris with Johnny Cash’s
“Understand Your Man” playing softly in the backround.
=============== I don’t understand fetishes. Does this mean something like: one is attracted to certain parts of the body only, or one likes to use rope and tie their partner up?
==================Fetish? How to say it in Chinese? Like these guys in the news who steal bras hanging outside to dry? Or men who upskirt MRT girls with their cellphone cams? Is that what a fetish is?
============= I can’t fetish it out.
Something like that. Or jerking off while sneezing to used women’s underwear.
My fetish is to naked women. Preferably willing. Preferably in my bed. Do I need treatment?
Freud’s idea about men with fetishes was something like this.
At a certain stage in a boy’s life he gets confronted by the sight of his mother naked. The shock of this, with all its oedipal suggestions, causes him to look away. At that point the object which he sees becomes for him the embodiment of strange repressed oedipal (oedipul?) sexual desires. As he often looks down, feet and shoes are common fetishistic objects.
Brian
Oh yeah, Freud;'s sense of ‘fetish’ is tied in with male castration horror. That is the horror when he sees his mother naked without a phallus. The object of the fetish is a substitute for this:
[quote]It is not true that, after the child has made his observation of the woman, he has preserved unaltered his belief that women have a phallus. He has retained that belief, but he has also given it up. In the conflict between the weight of the unwelcome perception and the force of his counter-wish, a compromise has been reached, as is only possible under the dominance of the unconscious laws of thought–the primary processes. Yes, in his mind, the woman has got a penis, in spite of everything; but this penis is no longer the same as it was before. Something else has taken its place, has been appointed its substitute, as it were, and now inherits the interest which was formerly directed to its predecessor. But this interest sufferes an extraordinary increase as well, because the horror of castration has set up a memorial to itself in the creation of this substitute. Furthermore, an aversion, which is never absent in any fetishist, to the real female genitals remains a stigma indelebile of the repression that has taken place. We can now see what the fetish achieves and what it is that maintains it. It remains as a token of triumph over the threat of castration and a protection against it. It also saves the fetishist from becoming a homosexual, by endowing women with the characteristic which makes them tolerable as sexual objects. In later life, the fetishist feels that he enjoys yet another advantage from his substitute for a genital. The meaning of the fetish is not known to other people, so the fetish is not withheld from him: it is easily accessible and he can readily obtain the sexual satisfaction attached to it. What other men have to woo and make exertions for can be had by the fetishist with no trouble at all.
Probably no male human being is spared the fright of castration at the sight of a female genital. Why some people become homosexual as a consequence of that impression, while others fend it off be creating a fetish, and the great majority surmount it, we are frankly unable to explain. It is possible that, among all the factors at work, we do not yet know those which are decisive for the rare pathological result. We must be content if we can explain what has happened, and may for the present leave on one side the task of explaining why something has not happened.
[/quote]
Brian, you are aware that Freud and his theories have been widely discredited in the scientific field and are no longer taken seriously by psychologists? He may have been the founder of modern psychology but his Victorian ideas about life revolving around repressed sexuality are very outdated.
Oh yeah. I just think it’s funny looking at what a nutter Freud was. Some of his ideas are hilarious. Also relevant because he more or less coined the word ‘fetish’ at least as it relates to sexual use.
Brian
Can’t you just imagine the young Father Dougal Maguire walking into the laundry, to suddenly be confronted with the sight of his own mother naked, the medusa-like coils of her pubic hair surrounding … NOTHING! no phallus. Suddenly in fear of his own possible castration, Dougal looks away and fixes his eyes on this:
Never having fully come to terms with this defining moment in his sexual history, Dougal’s sexuality is perverted. Joining the priesthood out of his fear of women, he is only able to gratify his sexual desires through the fetishisation of twin-washers. Sexual partners are often bemused by his insistence that sex occur in the laundry - preferably on top of the washing machine.
Brian
Now now, don’t get me started on twin washers. Having two at once has always been a fantasy of mine.
[quote=“Bu Lai En”]Sexual partners are often bemused by his insistence that sex occur in the laundry - preferably on top of the washing machine.
Brian[/quote]
Clearly you’ve never heard of (or tried) unbalancing the load. :mrgreen:
[quote=“MaPoDoFu”][quote=“Bu Lai En”]Sexual partners are often bemused by his insistence that sex occur in the laundry - preferably on top of the washing machine.
Brian[/quote]
Clearly you’ve never heard of (or tried) unbalancing the load. :mrgreen:[/quote]
That, or “adding whitener”. :shock:
I am surprised that none of you has mentioned a milkman fetish. I mean when you looked away from your naked mother the next thing you saw was a naked milkman.
That doesn’t explain why so many of you have a fetish for naked women. What exactly was it that you saw when you looked away?
ha, ha, haaaa. Maybe you but I saw was a naked asian woman because I didn’t open my eye’s until I was 28.
Remember Andy Lau (was that him?) and his toilet fetish?
Enjoy!
Doing it on the top of a washing machine is great. Too bad not good here, as it’s in plain sight of the whole neighborhood.
Gee… wouldn’t THAT be a great story for the Apple Daily… :shock: “Waiguoren Whirlpool Washer Wowser” (Ok, I know that’s a bad headline. It’s late.)
It’s funny that aside from a few people here, no one’s revealed his or her own fetish. Of course, that doesn’t necessarily mean I’m going to either, but I thought it was an interesting insight to the thread so far. Either you all don’t have one or it’s so kinky that you don’t feel you can share it here. I do have a thing for big, hairy guys although I wouldn’t call that a fetish per se.
Big Fluffy Matthew, don’t worry. It doesn’t mean I’m going to tackle you at the next Games Club…I promise.
:mrgreen:
Maybe they saw her reflection in the mirror. Yikes!
“Father Maguire, forgive me for I have spin (and pre-wash too).”