One aspect that is immediately apparent to those of us who moved to Taiwan (instead of being raised here) is the willy nilly mixing up of commercial, residential, sometimes industrial, agricultural . . . Does zoning even exist here?
The positives: mixed use dense neighbourhoods with lots of amenities nearby. Often shorter commutes. Convenience.
The negatives: sometimes noisier. Mixing up industrial and agricultural uses is frankly stupid, though in fairness that’s not what Luthiers was bemoaning.
Toronto is apparently a miserable uaffordable place lately. I’m not sure you’d want to put this forward in the 2020s as a positive model of urbanism . . .
I didn’t mention anything about price. Price has nothing to do with the question.
Similarly, if people are not wanting to move there because it’s not an attractive place, then the prices would not be high as the demand would crash and the prices would too.
In the last 20 years, Old Toronto has seen a 50% increase in permanent population.
Better than next to a garbage dump or industrial zone, worse than next to a mountain stream. Makes sense depending where ones starting point is.
Office districts tend to have nice things like sidewalks and accessibility for customers, unlike most of Taiwan. This might not be so obvious to people in parts of Taipei, but it’s obvious as an average nationwide.
If I were to do the city life, office districts would appeal to me. Sidewalks, parks, beautification, theoretically more educated (hopefully polite) population etc.